Why the existence of the potential function ##U## is not sufficient?

In summary, in this conversation from Sommerfeld's Lectures on Theoretical Physics, it is discussed that for liquids to be in equilibrium, the external force must have a potential, represented by the scalar function ##U##. However, it is not enough for ##U## to simply exist; it must also be single valued within the space occupied by the liquid. This means that the work done around a loop in the field created by the potential must be zero. This concept may be difficult to understand, as it is a specific requirement for equilibrium that goes beyond just the existence of a potential function.
  • #1
Adesh
735
191
Homework Statement
See the main body
Relevant Equations
See the main body
In Sommerfeld’s Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol II, Chapter 2, Section 6, Page 43 we derive an expression for the equilibrium of liquids as $$ grad ~p = \mathbf F$$ Where ##p## is the pressure and ##F## is the exertnal force. Then he writes,
[ The equation above ]includes a very remarkable Theorem: equilibrium is only possible if the external force has a potential, that is, if ##\mathbf F## can be represented as the gradient of a scalar function: $$ \mathbf F = -grad ~U$$ Where the minus sign is prompted by the relation to the potential energy. The existence of the potential function ##U## is not sufficient, ##U## must also be single valued within the space occupied by the liquid.

My problem is why existence of potential function is not sufficient? When he writes “##U## must also be single valued” I couldn’t understand him as a scalar function will always be “single valued”. What he actually meant ? Please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I asked it to someone and he said that “single valued” means a kind of potential so that work done around a loop (in the field created by that potential) comes out to be zero. But I couldn’t understand what he meant, beacuse in the original text Sommerfeld wanted “##U## to be single-valued” and he (Sommerfeld) said that ##U## was a scalar function so I don’t know what’s happening.
 
Back
Top