A Why the James Webb Space Telescope needs propellant

Click For Summary
Orbits around Lagrange points, such as L2, are inherently unstable and require periodic trajectory adjustments to maintain. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is not scheduled for refueling, meaning it will drift away from L2 once its propellant is depleted. Simulations indicate that without propulsion, the JWST could end up in a wide Earth orbit, potentially becoming unsynchronized with the Moon's orbit. The influence of the Sun and other planets complicates these orbital patterns. Ultimately, the JWST's fate after losing propellant remains uncertain, but it may settle into a resonant orbit similar to that of Jupiter's moons.
James Demers
Messages
75
Reaction score
44
TL;DR
The orbit of the JWST around its Lagrange point is unstable, and has to be tweaked if the telescope is to remain on station. What happens when the propellant runs out?
Orbits around the Lagrange point are not stable, and you need to tweak your trajectory every now and then to remain in that orbit. Simulations of a non-accelerated body give spectacularly weird results:

When the propellant runs out, is this what the JWST will do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume this includes only Earth's and Moon's gravity. The Sun and other planets will probably mess those nice periodic patterns up.
 
It is not scheduled for refuel, so when its propellant runs out, it will drift out of the L2 point and find its own orbit.

Someone has run a simulation:
https://space.stackexchange.com/que...falls-off-the-l2-or-l1-point-where-will-it-go

Their conclusion, which I cannot vouch for, suggests that it may end up in a wide Earth orbit, beyond the Moon (IOW, still orbiting Earth but no longer synced to the Moon's revolution). I'm just guessing here but I imagine it might end up in a resonant orbit with the Moon (like Jupiter's Galilean satellites)
 
Last edited:
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...