Graduate Why the James Webb Space Telescope needs propellant

Click For Summary
Orbits around Lagrange points, such as L2, are inherently unstable and require periodic trajectory adjustments to maintain. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is not scheduled for refueling, meaning it will drift away from L2 once its propellant is depleted. Simulations indicate that without propulsion, the JWST could end up in a wide Earth orbit, potentially becoming unsynchronized with the Moon's orbit. The influence of the Sun and other planets complicates these orbital patterns. Ultimately, the JWST's fate after losing propellant remains uncertain, but it may settle into a resonant orbit similar to that of Jupiter's moons.
James Demers
Messages
75
Reaction score
44
TL;DR
The orbit of the JWST around its Lagrange point is unstable, and has to be tweaked if the telescope is to remain on station. What happens when the propellant runs out?
Orbits around the Lagrange point are not stable, and you need to tweak your trajectory every now and then to remain in that orbit. Simulations of a non-accelerated body give spectacularly weird results:

When the propellant runs out, is this what the JWST will do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume this includes only Earth's and Moon's gravity. The Sun and other planets will probably mess those nice periodic patterns up.
 
It is not scheduled for refuel, so when its propellant runs out, it will drift out of the L2 point and find its own orbit.

Someone has run a simulation:
https://space.stackexchange.com/que...falls-off-the-l2-or-l1-point-where-will-it-go

Their conclusion, which I cannot vouch for, suggests that it may end up in a wide Earth orbit, beyond the Moon (IOW, still orbiting Earth but no longer synced to the Moon's revolution). I'm just guessing here but I imagine it might end up in a resonant orbit with the Moon (like Jupiter's Galilean satellites)
 
Last edited:
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K