Why the K.E. Increases in a 10-Stage Linac Accelerator with 200 kV Supply

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drift Tube
AI Thread Summary
In a 10-stage linac accelerator powered by a 200 kV supply, the kinetic energy (K.E.) of electrons increases significantly across stages, with stage 2 exhibiting double the K.E. of stage 1. When an electron is accelerated through a potential difference (p.d.) of 300V, its K.E. is calculated as 4.8 x 10^-17 J. If this electron is then accelerated through another 300V, its new K.E. would not simply double to 9.6 x 10^-17 J, but rather follow the formula for K.E. based on its mass and velocity. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of using drift tubes to shield electrons from incorrect polarity voltages, ensuring they only experience the intended acceleration. The calculations are simplified by using electron-volt (eV) units for energy.
jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
Lets say we had a 10-stage linac accelerator and we were using a 200 kV supply.
Apparently the K.E at stage 2 (in the second tube) is twice that of the first tube (stage 1).
why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fact a better question is:

If an electron, starting at 0 m/s is accelerated across a p.d of 300V its new KE is
4.8 * 10-17J (E = QV).
My question is, if I accelerate this electron (with this KE) through another p.d of 300V then, disregarding relativistic effects, will the new KE be
4.8 * 10-17J *2 = 9.6*10-17J ?If not then what will it be?
 
jsmith613 said:
In fact a better question is:

If an electron, starting at 0 m/s is accelerated across a p.d of 300V its new KE is
4.8 * 10-17J (E = QV).
My question is, if I accelerate this electron (with this KE) through another p.d of 300V then, disregarding relativistic effects, will the new KE be
4.8 * 10-17J *2 = 9.6*10-17J ?
It is easier to do the calculations using eV (electron-volt) units. The electron mass in eV units is mc2 = 511,000 eV. The kinetic energy is
KE=\frac{1}{2}mv^2=\frac{1}{2}\beta^2mc^2
where v=βc and c = 3 x 108 meters per second. So
\beta=\sqrt{\frac{2\cdot KE}{mc^2}}
So β = 0.03427, 0.04846, 0.05935, etc. for n=1, 2, 3, etc. and KE =n·300 eV.

When the electron is inside a drift tube, it is completely shielded from the applied voltage. You have to use an ac voltage and a drift tube so that when the applied voltage is the wrong polarity, the drift tube shields the electron, and the electron only "sees" the correct polarity voltage.

[added] If you use an ac frequency of f = 100 MHz, the drift tube lengths are L=\frac{\beta c}{2f}= 0.05141, 0.07269, .08903 meters etc.
 
Last edited:
Bob S said:
It is easier to do the calculations using eV (electron-volt) units. The electron mass in eV units is mc2 = 511,000 eV. The kinetic energy is
KE=\frac{1}{2}mv^2=\frac{1}{2}\beta^2mc^2
where v=βc and c = 3 x 108 meters per second. So
\beta=\sqrt{\frac{2\cdot KE}{mc^2}}
So β = 0.03427, 0.04846, 0.05935, etc. for n=1, 2, 3, etc. and KE =n·300 eV.

When the electron is inside a drift tube, it is completely shielded from the applied voltage. You have to use an ac voltage and a drift tube so that when the applied voltage is the wrong polarity, the drift tube shields the electron, and the electron only "sees" the correct polarity voltage.

[added] If you use an ac frequency of f = 100 MHz, the drift tube lengths are L=\frac{\beta c}{2f}= 0.05141, 0.07269, .08903 meters etc.

OK so a good way to see it is as follows:

tube 1 --> tube 2 - KE doubles
tube 2 --> tube 3 - KE * 1.5

so
Tube 1 = L
tube 2 = L*sqrt(2) = L-new
tube 3 = L-new * sqrt(1.5)

but this has answered by question so thanks a lot :)
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top