Why topological invariants instead of topological invariances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmssm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topological
AI Thread Summary
The term "invariant" functions as both an adjective and a noun, indicating something that possesses the property of being invariant. In contrast, "invariance" is solely a noun that describes the property itself rather than an object. The discussion highlights the nuanced differences in meaning and usage between these terms in English. The complexity of English language is acknowledged, emphasizing its unique characteristics. Understanding these distinctions is essential for clarity in discussions about topological concepts.
mmssm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Isnt it invariant an adjective?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because that's the way English is.

"Invariant" is indeed an adjective, but it is also a noun referring to something that has the property of being invariant. In the (tautological) sentence "I know that this quantity is an invariant because it is invariant", the word "invariant" is used twice, once a noun and once as adjective.

And "invariance" is also noun, but it refers to the property that is described by the adjective, not to an object that has that property: "I know that this quantity is an invariant because is invariant, which is to say that it has the property of invariance".

English is weird. I love it for its quirkiness and expressive power, but it's still weird.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top