Why Velocity Same at Min Separation? | Conservation of Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why two positively charged pucks maintain the same velocity at minimum separation despite repelling each other. It highlights that minimum separation occurs when their relative velocity is zero, not necessarily when both velocities are zero. The conservation of momentum is crucial in understanding their motion, as it allows for a solution that shows they can still have nonzero velocities in the lab frame. Factors such as initial speeds and masses of the pucks influence the analysis. Ultimately, the key point is that minimum separation does not equate to zero velocity for both objects involved.
EgpYo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is the velocity the same at minimum separation?
For example, two positively charged pucks are traveling towards each other. Find the minimum separation.

They oppose each other so they should slow down and reach minimum separation when their velocities are 0. It does not make sense to solve for when their velocities are the same. Because I get an answer of 1.0m/s, but how can they be at minimum separation if they are still moving?

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


Use conservation of momentum to solve for the velocity. This is what the book says, but why? Shouldnt the minimum distance be when both of their velocities are 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Much depends upon the frame of reference used to judge what the velocities are, what the initial speeds of the pucks are (are they different?), the masses of the pucks (are they different?). While minimum separation will take place when the relative velocity of the pucks is zero, the two may still have some nonzero velocity in the lab frame of reference.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top