Why Was My First Attempt Wrong in Calculating iPod Probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a probability problem involving students with iPods, where the correct calculation uses a binomial distribution to find the probability of exactly 10 out of 20 students having at least one iPod. The initial incorrect approach mistakenly calculated the probability of at least one iPod as the complement of having no iPods, which led to an erroneous result. The correct complement involves considering all scenarios where the number of students with iPods is not exactly 10, rather than just the absence of iPods. Understanding this distinction clarifies the mistake in the initial calculation. The key takeaway is recognizing the appropriate complementary probabilities in binomial distributions.
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Here is a problem that I found in a library book.

In Canada, 38% of all students have an iPod. What is the probability that 10 out of 20 randomly selected students have AT LEAST ONE iPod?

This is my CORRECT solution.

It is a binomial distribution. So, I do P(having an iPod) = 0.38 which is the success

20 choose 10 times (.38)^10 times (.62)^10 = 0.097

I happened to come up with the correct solution after my first attempt.

In my first attempt, this is what I did.

P(at least one iPod) = 1 - P(no iPod) which gives the wrong answer.


Why is my first attempt wrong? Please explain.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How did you calculate P(no iPod)?
 
First you note down the chance of each configuration to happen, that is just multiply together the probabilities of each event in solitude. Now it doesn't matter which 10 of the 20 students that got ipods, so you got to add together the probabilities of all configurations which have 10 students with ipods. But since all configurations have the same probability you just multiply the probability of one with the number of configurations which is just 20 chose 10.
 
davedave said:
In my first attempt, this is what I did.

P(at least one iPod) = 1 - P(no iPod) which gives the wrong answer.

Why is my first attempt wrong? Please explain.
What you most likely did is to misunderstand what is the correct complimentary probability in this case.

Think about it. The complement of "10 out of 20 have and ipod" is definitely not the same thing as "10 our of 20 do not have ipod's"!

So what then is the correct complement? It is that some proportion other than 10 out of 20 (eg 0/20 1/20 2/20 … 9/20 11/20 ... 20/20) have an ipod.

Do you see your mistake now?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top