Why was my girlfriend switched to Trinessa birth control?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aychamo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the switch of a girlfriend's birth control from OrthoTriCyclen to Trinessa, a generic version. Participants explore the implications of this switch, including concerns about quality, efficacy, and patient autonomy in understanding medication changes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Trinessa is a generic form of OrthoTriCyclen, questioning whether there is any difference in quality.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of patients understanding their prescriptions, suggesting that the girlfriend should ask her doctor about the switch and the implications of using a generic medication.
  • Another participant agrees, expressing concern about patient autonomy and the need for clear communication regarding medication changes.
  • A participant mentions that generics typically contain the same active ingredients as brand names, but differences in inactive ingredients could affect individuals with allergies.
  • One contributor discusses the patent system, explaining that brand names hold monopolies for a period, after which generics can be produced at lower costs, potentially leading to a switch by the doctor to a more affordable option.
  • Another participant shares a personal experience, noting that some medical professionals believe generics are acceptable for regulating cycles but may not be as reliable for contraception, citing concerns about efficacy variations in generics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reliability of generic medications for contraception, with some advocating for the use of generics and others cautioning against them due to potential efficacy variations. There is no consensus on whether the switch to Trinessa is advisable without further clarification from the prescribing doctor.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight concerns regarding the efficacy of generics compared to brand names, particularly in the context of oral contraception, and the importance of understanding the reasons behind medication switches. There are mentions of potential variations in inactive ingredients that could affect individuals with specific allergies.

aychamo
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Hey guys

My girlfriend's doctor recently switched from OrthoTriCyclin (sp) to Trinessa birth control. She isn't fully aware of why she was switched. What do you know about this brand of birth control?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Well, from what I've read, it seems that Trinessa is a generic form of the first type of birth control she is on.. Is there any difference in quality?
 
I just wanted to make a quick comment on this topic. If your girlfriend is at all uncertain why she was prescribed the generic rather than brand name pill or wants to confirm the quality is the same or that this was intentional on the part of the doctor and not a mix-up at the pharmacy, she should call her doctor and ASK. Any time a patient is prescribed anything, they should fully understand why they need the prescription, why that particular medication is the best for them, and know exactly which medication it is the doctor has prescribed, whether generics are acceptable, and if so, what are the names of the generics so they will recognize it when the pharmacist gives it to them. Some of those questions can also be asked of the pharmacist.

Usually generics have the same active ingredients as brand names and the only difference is the formulation of the inactive ingredients. For most people, this is no big deal unless the generic is adding something that changes the release or absorption rate of the medication. However, it is something to be aware of if you have allergies, because inactive ingredients can include things like corn starch, so someone allergic to corn products would need to find a specific brand without the corn starch, or have a compounding pharmacist specially formulate their medications for them to avoid things they are allergic to.
 
Aye, I totally agree with you. She said something like he wanted to test it with her. I am guessing, with the information from your post, that he was seeing if the generic would act just as well with her.

But I totally agree. When she told me she switched, and I asked why, and she had no idea I got a bit upset. I guess the idea of autonomy is out of the window here. Wayy too much doctor trust. I'm not saying the doctor is wrong, just I agree with you, that the patient should know *exactly* what they are taking.
 
Well, I wouldn't know. Just a thought: the brand names usually have a patent on their active ingredients for a few years, from which they make the money to conduct research into novel medications. During this time they hold a monopoly. After a while this patent will expire and the smaller companies will be able to copy the active product used and put on the market a much cheaper version of the same medication (cheaper because they didn't have to do the research, didn't have to pay for the patent, and there no longer is a monopoly position). The brand name still has the good name it earned during the years of monopoly, so they will keep the price high.

So probably the doctor found out that the medication has the same activity, and prescribed the cheaper version. As Moonbear said, just check with the pharmacist or the doctor :)
 
This may be a little late in coming but my mail order prescription service pulled the same "switcharoo" on me.

Some Ob/Gyns I know are generally of the opinion that generics are just fine if they are being taken to regulate cycles, PMS, etc. However, if they are being used for oral contraception, it is better to stick with the name brand. The thinking behind that is this: to qualify as a generic, the drug in question can vary in the neighborhood of 20 or 40% efficacy (I forget which). Frankly, that's a little scary to me...especially when the consequences could be pretty extreme.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K