Why we cant resolve nonrenormalization problem in gravitation by freely adding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why we can not resolve the nonrenormalization problem in quantum gravity by freely adding the counterterms with bare parameters nonzero but the corresponding physical parameters being zero.
Thank you very much in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the moment,I have just understood that in gravity field theory(quantum) the number of divergent diagrams is infinite,then the procedure is impossible.
 
One can always introduce more and more counter terms in order to cancel divergences such that observables( e.g. renormalized couplings) remain finite. The problem with perturbative gravity is that the counter terms will not have the same form as the original action so new couplings have to be introduced at every order. These couplings then correspond to more observables that must be fixed by experiment. Since there will be an infinite number the theory isn't predictive at least as a fundamental theory.

On the other hand one can still treat perturbative gravity as an effective theory at low energies (http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0311082v1) because one can show that the new couplings that have to be introduced are suppressed by the Planck mass. So the theory can still be predictive as long as E/M_pl is small where E is the energy scale of the experiment and M_pl is the Planck mass.


I hope that's useful.
 
ndung200790 said:
Why we can not resolve the nonrenormalization problem in quantum gravity by freely adding the counterterms with bare parameters nonzero but the corresponding physical parameters being zero.
There is no any physical reason why would these physical parameters be zero. Indeed, a high-energy experiment would probably reveal that they are not zero.
 
Thank you very much again!
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top