Why we don't use visible light to cook food?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Microwave ovens are preferred for cooking food over visible light due to their ability to efficiently transfer energy to water molecules. Microwaves operate at specific frequencies that match the absorption characteristics of water, allowing for deeper penetration into food compared to visible light, which primarily cooks only the surface. Generating sufficient power at the correct frequency is crucial, as normal visible light sources lack the intensity required for effective cooking. Additionally, while infrared radiation can be used in conjunction with convection, visible light does not penetrate materials effectively, necessitating reliance on conduction for cooking the interior of food.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of microwave energy and its interaction with water molecules
  • Knowledge of photon frequency and absorption characteristics
  • Familiarity with cooking methods and heat transfer principles
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetic radiation, including infrared and visible light
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of microwave energy conversion compared to LED lighting
  • Explore the principles of photon frequency and its impact on cooking
  • Investigate the design and function of microwave cavities in ovens
  • Study the role of infrared radiation in cooking and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Food scientists, culinary professionals, and anyone interested in the science of cooking methods and heat transfer technologies.

Anindya Mondal
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
As we know that microwaves have less energy than visible light , then do we use microwave oven in cooking food instead of visible light?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure its because microwaves transfer energy to water molecules very efficiently. If you shine a micro-wave emitting flashlight on some water, it will heat up a lot more than if you shine a visible light emitting flashlight at some water.

Its about the specific frequency of the photons and that matching what water molecules will absorb.

Edit - I did some post-posting Googling (barn door after horse) and I am wrong. Its more about being able to generate enough power at a convenient frequency and how far into the food the radiation can penetrate as its dissipating its energy - not about making water molecules vibrate at some specific frequency.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
Normal sources of visible light are not high enough intensity unless you use a laser. You can use sunlight to cook although about half is infra red. .Another issue is that visible light does not penetrate material so cooking would only be on the surface you would have to rely on conduction to cook the inside.
 
x-rays have even more energy per photon. Why do you think they are not used for cooking? I can think of more than one reason.
 
Some years ago I saw an advert for a Pizza oven that used light sources for cooking. The ad claimed that they were faster blah blah. I did a quick search but as you can imagine "White light pizza oven" did not return anything useful.

Cheers
 
cosmik debris said:
Some years ago I saw an advert for a Pizza oven that used light sources for cooking. The ad claimed that they were faster blah blah. I did a quick search but as you can imagine "White light pizza oven" did not return anything useful.
Try a different search term... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easy-Bake_Oven
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and Grinkle
nasu said:
x-rays have even more energy per photon. Why do you think they are not used for cooking? I can think of more than one reason.
What is the reason?
nasu said:
x-rays have even more energy per photon. Why do you think they are not used for cooking? I can think of more than one reason.
 
Grinkle said:
I'm pretty sure its because microwaves transfer energy to water molecules very efficiently. If you shine a micro-wave emitting flashlight on some water, it will heat up a lot more than if you shine a visible light emitting flashlight at some water.

Its about the specific frequency of the photons and that matching what water molecules will absorb.

Edit - I did some post-posting Googling (barn door after horse) and I am wrong. Its more about being able to generate enough power at a convenient frequency and how far into the food the radiation can penetrate as its dissipating its energy - not about making water molecules vibrate at some specific frequency.
Why microwaves transfer energy to molecules more efficiently?
 
  • #10
In addition to the above, microwave ovens work by creating a microwave cavity inside.
 
  • #11
Note that infrared radiation is used at least in conjunction with convection for grilles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
13K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K