- 4,796
- 32
There's a "theorem" in my book that says if x is a cluster point of {x_n}, then lim inf(x_n)\leqx\leqlim sup(x_n).
The way the author proves it is a little bit extravagant. Why not just say "Let A be the set of all cluster points. Then, lim inf(x_n)=inf(A)\leqx\leqsup(A)=lim sup(x_n)."
?
The way the author proves it is a little bit extravagant. Why not just say "Let A be the set of all cluster points. Then, lim inf(x_n)=inf(A)\leqx\leqsup(A)=lim sup(x_n)."
?