Why Won't a Space Probe with 3GMm/R Energy Escape Earth's Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter confused200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Speed
AI Thread Summary
A space probe launched with energy E=(3GMm/R) is initially thought to have sufficient energy to escape Earth's gravity. However, the minimum kinetic energy required to escape is actually -GMm/R, indicating that the probe's energy is not enough for deep space travel. The discussion highlights confusion over the energy calculations and the role of gravitational forces, including those from the Sun. Participants suggest that additional gravitational influences may need to be considered. Ultimately, the probe cannot escape Earth's gravity with the given energy alone.
confused200
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A space probe is launched from the equator in the direction of the north pole of the Earth. During launch the energy given to the probe of mass m is

E=(3GMm/R)

Deduce that the Space probe will not be able to travel into deep space

Homework Equations



Minimum KE needed = - GMm/R

The Attempt at a Solution



I said that if minimum KE was as above then having three times that would mean that it would escape but the answer is that it won't so I'm puzzled? How do I deduce that it won't escape if it has 3 times the energy E=(3GMm/R)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should it have a negative sign in front of it, I remember something bout infinity? Please help!

confused200 said:

Homework Statement



A space probe is launched from the equator in the direction of the north pole of the Earth. During launch the energy given to the probe of mass m is

E=(3GMm/R)

Deduce that the Space probe will not be able to travel into deep space

Homework Equations



Minimum KE needed = - GMm/R

The Attempt at a Solution



I said that if minimum KE was as above then having three times that would mean that it would escape but the answer is that it won't so I'm puzzled? How do I deduce that it won't escape if it has 3 times the energy E=(3GMm/R)
 
hmm. You're right, that the probe should be able to completely escape from the Earth's gravitational field... Maybe you are also supposed to take into account the gravitational field from the sun?...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top