- #1
NWH
- 107
- 0
The question is pretty simple, why would we even want to combine the two big theories to create a unified theory of everything? Is it not better to simply say that the laws of physics behave differently at these scales and that a theory of one doesn't necessarily have to work with another? Granted we need to work towards a theory that explains all the forces of nature, but perhaps logic and reason from one scale simply can not be applied in the other, such as the assumption that particles behave like solid objects like atoms or molecules and are bound by our laws of nature, for example. Is it not a fallacy in logic and arrogant of us to expect one single theory to explain everything we observe (and don't observe) in the universe around us?