Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Wiegner Eckart theorem, I don't understand it!

  1. Jul 16, 2012 #1
    Hello,
    In derivation of quadrupole effect (which influences NMR spectrum for nuclei with spin ≥ 1/2), there is one step I do not understand, it is Eckart Wiegner theorem, more specific:

    just relavant equations:

    Qαβ=∫(3xαxβαβr2)ρdr

    So here is the W-E:

    <I,m|Qαβ|I,m'>=C<I,m|3/2(IαIβ-IβIα)-δαβI2|I,m'>

    and we expres constant C witm matrix element for m=m'=I, and α=β=z:

    eQ=<I,I|QzzI,I|>=C<I,I|3Iz2-I2|I,I>=<I,I|I(2I-1)|I,I>



    questions:
    how can we express Qαβ with spin operator?
    can someone comment on every step what is being done? I would like to understand this intuitively if possible...Great thanks!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 16, 2012 #2

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Jamalll, What the Wigner-Eckart Theorem says is that the matrix elements of all quadrupole operators have the same m dependence.

    Not saying that Q has any simple relationship to I, it's just that 3/2(IαIβ + IβIα) - δαβ is the easiest quadrupole operator to construct and evaluate, and so we use it on the right-hand side to give us something to compare the matrix elements of Q with.
     
  4. Jul 16, 2012 #3
    hey, thanks for reply....


    But I still can not make any sense out of it.... I know I repeat myself, but
    how do you "convert" coordinates in spin operator? What is the significance of "m" and" m' "?

    I know it is the state of nucleus with spin "I" and spin projection "m", right?
     
  5. Jul 26, 2012 #4
    Well I am sorry but there is not a single mind which can desolve this?

    Baby I am only human!!!

    please......pretty plase
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Wiegner Eckart theorem, I don't understand it!
  1. Wigner-Eckart theorem (Replies: 5)

  2. Wigner Eckart theorem (Replies: 4)

Loading...