Undergrad Wigner's Theorem That All Fields Must Be Tensors

Click For Summary
Wigner's 1939 theorem establishes that all fields must be tensors, a significant result in the context of relativistic quantum field theory (QFT). The original paper, "On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group," is recommended for its clarity and importance in scientific writing. The discussion also touches on the no interaction theorem, with a desire for a comprehensive resource compiling such pivotal results. It is noted that in quantum theory, the proper orthochronous Lorentz group is replaced by its covering group, allowing for half-integer spins and fermions. Accessing Wigner's original work is essential for understanding these foundational concepts.
Messages
10,967
Reaction score
3,837
I know in 1939 Wigner published a theorem that all fields must be tensors from a couple of books, but can't find the proof anywhere. That obviously is an important result so does anyone know where I can find the proof? Another I haven't seen the proof of is the no interaction theorem. I wish someone would publish book with these kind of results are in one place.

Thanks
Bill
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just read the original paper. It's a milestone in relativistic (Q)FT and, imho, also in scientific writing:

E. P. Wigner, On Unitary Representations of the Inhomgeneous Lorentz Group, Annals of Mathematics 40 (1939) 149.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632(89)90402-7

Of course, in the context of QT, it's not the Poincare group (or "inhomogeneous Lorentz group") as Wigner writes in the title but the (central extensions of) the covering group. Since there are no non-trivial central extensions (see Weinberg's QT of Fields, Vol. I) the only thing is that the proper orthochronous Lorentz groiup as a subgroup of the Poincare group is to be substituted by its covering group, which is ##\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})## (with the ##\mathrm{SU}(2)## as a subgroup reprenting spatial rotations of course as in non-relativistic QT). The importance of this is that within quantum theory you can have half-integer spin (or helicities for massless particles) and fermions.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K