Will a Halved Earth Orbital Period Affect Solar and Sidereal Days Differently?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carolyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar
AI Thread Summary
Halving the Earth's orbital period would affect the solar day by increasing its length due to the sun's apparent movement across the sky. Currently, a solar day is about 4 minutes longer than a sidereal day because the Earth must rotate slightly more to align with the sun after completing one rotation. If the Earth orbited the sun twice as fast, the sun would appear to move twice as far in the same time frame, necessitating an additional 8 minutes for the solar day. Consequently, the new solar day would be approximately 24 minutes and 4 seconds long. This adjustment highlights the relationship between Earth's rotation and its orbit around the sun.
Carolyn
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I know that a solar day is about 4 minutes longer than a sidereal day.

But what if the Earth orbital period around the sun is halved, but the rotation period is same?

Will the solar day still be about 4 minutes longer?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The 4minutes is to account for the distance across the sky the sun moves in a day.
So it takes 23:56 min for the Earth to rotate but then you have to move another 4mins to catch up with the sun which has moved on a bit.
If the earht moved twice as fast around the sun, the sun would have moved twice as far and so you would need (roughly) an extra 8 minutes to catch up and a solar day would 24:04.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72
this makes sense, thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top