Will Earth's Rotation Ever Synchronize with its Orbit Around the Sun?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether Earth's rotation could eventually synchronize with its orbit around the Sun, similar to the Moon's synchronous rotation with Earth. It highlights that while synchronization could theoretically occur, the gravitational influence of the Sun and the eventual life cycle of the Sun will significantly alter Earth's and the Moon's orbits. Some participants suggest that Earth's rotation might first synchronize with the Moon's revolution before considering synchronization with the Sun. However, the Moon's orbital period cannot match a year due to stability concerns. Ultimately, the fate of Earth's rotation is intertwined with the Sun's lifecycle, which will precede any potential synchronization.
Leonardo Muzzi
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Will the Earth's rotation someday be synchronized with its revolution around the Sun (one rotation on the axis per revolution), such as the Moon around the Earth? If not, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think it should be?
 
Why synchronized with the sun, and not with the moon?
 
It should be for the same reason the Moon's rotation is synchronized, the Sun's gravity deforms the Earth a little bit to an oval form and them forces the rotation movement to synchronize with the revolution.

Thinking about mfb's post, maybe the Earth's rotation really should be synchronized with the Moon's revolution first. Then, the rotation of the Earth + Moon set should synchronize with the set's revolution around the sun.

Thoughts?
 
The moon cannot get an orbital period of one year - that does not give stable orbits.

Leonardo Muzzi said:
maybe the Earth's rotation really should be synchronized with the Moon's revolution first.
That would happen in the far future, but the sun will reach the end of its life first, which will alter the orbits of both Earth and moon significantly (including the possibility that they fall into the sun).
 
  • Like
Likes Leonardo Muzzi
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top