Will Running Increase Spit-Distance? Experimenting with Physics!

Click For Summary
Running before spitting is believed to increase the distance the spit travels due to the added horizontal velocity from the runner's speed. The energy from the runner's motion contributes to the spit’s initial speed, enhancing its distance upon release. Whether the runner stops or continues moving after spitting, the spit will travel further relative to a stationary observer. However, if the runner keeps moving, the spit may not travel as far from the runner themselves due to the headwind created by their motion. Overall, the physics suggests that a running start does positively impact spit distance.
Barfolumu
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Inspired by http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23696646-13762,00.html" .

Would running before you spit increase the distance your spit travels? I figure, most of the energy comes from your mouth, and you'd probably stop at the end of your run, so would a "running start" increase the distance?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that it increases the distance, assuming that you spit first and then stop running. The reason is that the spit inside you already has the speed of your moving and when you spit you add to that speed. So by the time the spit hits the ground (which is independent of horizontal velocity, so same in both running and non running cases), it has traveled further.

Think of it as pushing a barrel of a tall building vs pushing a barrel of a moving air-plane. Both of them seem to me be very common elementary physics problems, so I'm guessing you have come across them before. :)
 
Yes, it would increase the distance. This would be true whether you stop when you spit, or keep going. But of course, if you keep going, it will only increase the distance as measured by a stationary observer, your spit will not travel farther from you (indeed, it will not travel as far from yourself, as you would create a slight headwind by running.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
841
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K