Will the time will eventually stop like a snapshot?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lightermahn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a theory suggesting that time could eventually stop like a snapshot, raising questions about its validity. Mainstream science does not support the idea that time can simply cease, viewing it as unlikely. Instead, the prevailing theory regarding the universe's fate is heat death, though this remains speculative due to current limitations in our understanding of physics. The thread has been locked for moderation as it does not align with accepted scientific discourse. Overall, the concept of time stopping is not recognized as a feasible scenario in contemporary scientific discussions.
Lightermahn
Hi I have just read something about the ultimate fate of the universe and one of the theories claims that "Time will eventually stop like a snapshot and never start again" I know it may stop oneday when entropy reaches maximum but Is that true , but this theory claim that it will be like a "snapshot" I meant even when we are alive and entropy isn't maximum time will just stop, Is that possible or HOAX?

Here is article, check 7th theory;

http://listverse.com/2014/04/11/10-theories-on-how-the-universe-will-end/
 
Space news on Phys.org
Thread locked, pending moderation.
 
Hi Lightermahn,

Unfortunately the idea that time simply stops isn't accepted by mainstream science at this time, and according to PF rules cannot be discussed. That's not to say that it isn't science, only that mainstream scientists don't consider it a likely possibility at this time. The most probable fate of the universe, as far as we know at this time, is heat death, but even this is fairly speculative since it is very likely we don't know enough about physics to accurately extrapolate that far into the future about the universe as a whole.

Since the topic isn't about mainstream science, this thread will remain locked. If you haven't already, please read PF Terms and Rules.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top