Win $20,000: Calculating the Odds of Lottery Ticket Prizes

  • Thread starter Thread starter eldrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    lottery
eldrick
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
there is an interesting show I've caught on satellite which is based on a domestic lottery

you are given the choice of having 100,000 lottery tickets or a $20,000 cash prize

now to simplify, the odds of matching 3 balls out of 6 is

~ 1 in 56.6

& the prize for matching 3 balls is $10

if you used a rough calculation, you are likely to win ( just considering 3 balls )

100,000 *( 1/56.6)* 10 =

$17,660

if you took the option of 100,000 tickets


now, I'm asking what are the precise odds of winning $20,000 ( 2,000 winning "3 ball" tickets ) ?

i believe it may be something along the lines of


( (1/56.6) ^ 2000 ) * (55.6/56.6) ^98000 ) * no. of ways you can ?permute/ ? combine 2000 draws amongst 100,000


any help would be gratefully appreciated :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks right - the binomial term for 2000 successes where the probability p is 1/56.6, normalized by the total number of possibilities.
 
eldrick said:
now to simplify, the odds of matching 3 balls out of 6 is

~ 1 in 56.6

I don't get it? Why not 6 choose 3 ways of selecting 3 balls from 6 giving you odds of 1:19?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top