The Wobble Hypothesis: Calculating tRNA Utilization in the Genetic Code

  • Thread starter Thread starter LadiesMan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum number of tRNAs required to pair with 61 codons using the wobble hypothesis. The wobble theory suggests that the first two nucleotides of a codon are crucial, allowing for flexibility in the third position. This flexibility reduces the total number of tRNAs needed from 61 to a lower number. Participants consider whether the minimum number of tRNAs could be 16, based on the four possible nucleotides in the first two positions. The conversation emphasizes understanding the genetic code's structure and the implications of codon redundancy.
LadiesMan
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Using the wobble hypothesis and the genetic code, calculate the minimum number of tRNAs that a cell can utilize to pair up with 61 codons.

How do I carry this out?

- We know that there are 4 different bases: A,C,U,G (No T in RNA)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A codon has a sequence of 3 nucleotides, but the wobble theory applies to the last one, meaning that the most important nucleotides are the first two. This means that the amount of tRNAs required by disregarding the wobble hypothesis (61) can be reduced by a fractional amount.
 
ok ty! But, now, as I have two "important" areas for nucleotides and we have a possibility of 4 nucleotides in each would the minimum number of tRNAs be 16?
 
Are the 61 codons all different?
 
it doesn't tell you, but i would assume so. I don't think that is a matter for this question.
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Genetic Code: Val-tRNA Val - Anticodon Selection
Replies
2
Views
2K
Biology: how the wobble effect explains the degeneracy of the genetic code
Replies
2
Views
20K
Synthesis of a re-designed E. coli genome
Replies
3
Views
3K
Proteins' incorporation as a digestive enzyme in lysosome
Replies
1
Views
8K
Semi-synthetic organism with an expanded genetic code
Replies
8
Views
5K
Analyzing the Mechanics of a Wobble Plate in a Cranked Axle Mechanism
Replies
10
Views
3K
News Sydney Brenner: Pioneering Biolgist Who Developed C. Elegans Model Organism
Replies
1
Views
2K
Can a Single Nucleotide Mutation Significantly Change a Protein's Function?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Possible # alleles at locus of 3 base-pairs (diploid)?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Omnigenetic model for complex traits
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top