Women are more true and intense lovers than men

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackson6612
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Women
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the assertion that women are more intense lovers than men, with participants debating the validity of this claim. Some argue that generalizations about gender and love intensity are unwise, emphasizing the importance of individual differences. The conversation shifts to the need for definitions, particularly regarding what constitutes an "intense lover," with humor interjected as participants jokingly suggest testing this concept. There is a call to remove gender dichotomies, with one contributor reflecting on past experiences that suggest both men and women can exhibit varied behaviors in relationships. The dialogue highlights differing perspectives on love, intimacy, and gender roles, ultimately questioning the validity of broad stereotypes.
jackson6612
Messages
334
Reaction score
1
It is my general experience and observation that women are more true and intense lovers than men. Though, I myself am a male, there is no reason to lie about it. And, well, I'm not a cheater. What is your thinking on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think it is a ruse, and that you really don't want to go there.
 
Got anything to back that up jackson6612?

I strongly disagree and think it comes down to the individual.
 
It aint wise to generalize.
 
I need some definitions to accompany the sweeping generalisations, jackson6612. Define "intense lovers", please.

(Sidenote: I don't foresee this conversation going anywhere good unless comedy breaks out.)
 
GeorginaS said:
I need some definitions to accompany the sweeping generalisations, jackson6612. Define "intense lovers", please.

(Sidenote: I don't foresee this conversation going anywhere good unless comedy breaks out.)

I second that, and btw, what would be the Sisters' official definition of an "intense lover"? :biggrin:
 
radou said:
I second that, and btw, what would be the Sisters' official definition of an "intense lover"? :biggrin:
We need to do some testing.
Ladies, please line up to the right.
I'll volunteer.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I'll volunteer.

You'll volunteer for what ?
 
DaveC426913 said:
We need to do some testing.
Ladies, please line up to the right.
I'll volunteer.

*raises hand* Me too.
 
  • #10
radou said:
I second that, and btw, what would be the Sisters' official definition of an "intense lover"? :biggrin:


It's not *my* thread title, therefore it's not incumbent upon me to define words, parametres, and whatnot. (Keep an eye out for the 'whatnot'.)
 
  • #11
I vote for the gender dichotomy to be removed. At least in my younger years (IMO) women tend to be pretty mobile and non-committal. Of course my experience was during the advent of "the pill", so who knows what that could translate into today's setting. Still, in the mid-to-late 60's, it seemed to me that some ladies were bed-hopping and having a great time while some neanderthals were still tying to figure out why they weren't getting any action.
 
  • #12
I agree with turbo-1. There's no real difference between men and women. More true and intense lovers?! No way
 
  • #13
To men love is all about sex and love making!:smile:

PS:Don't kill me.I was kidding...:rolleyes:
 
  • #14
Lisa! said:
To men love is all about sex and love making!:smile:

PS:Don't kill me.I was kidding...:rolleyes:

I also like to hold hands, have tickle fights, and cuddle :wink:
 
Back
Top