Wondering about law of mass action

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinyong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Mass
jinyong
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am wondering why the law of mass action in semiconductors is this relation: n*p=ni^2. Any proof of this why is it not n*p=ni^3 or something...Also why doesn't dopants affect this relationship since doesn't dopants increase the overall number of carriers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it even make dimensional sense to write n*p=ni^3? You need to learn how the law is derived - you will find it in any solid state electronics text.

And yes, dopant concentrations are considered in arriving at that final result.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top