Wood color stardards by species?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim mcnamara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Color Wood
AI Thread Summary
Wood undergoes significant changes when exposed to sunlight, including color alterations, decreased film finish adhesion, and other negative effects. Lighter woods tend to darken while darker woods lighten over time. Specific examples include walnut becoming pale, white pine turning orange, and cherry developing a "sunburn." The discussion raises the question of whether there is an industry standard for wood color by species, with participants expressing skepticism about the existence of such a standard. One contributor highlights their website, which focuses on accurately colored wood pictures, while acknowledging the complexity of generalizing wood color. The conversation also touches on the historical context of wood identification, emphasizing that color was once considered a secondary characteristic compared to other properties like density and grain structure. The challenges of working with tropical woods, which are often beautiful but difficult to process, are also noted.
jim mcnamara
Mentor
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,852
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp57.pdf

Wood undergoes changes when exposed to direct sunlight (above reference) or
incidental light. One of the changes is a change in color. Others include decreased
film finish adhesion, and some other probably not so good changes.

Walnut becomes pale and washed out, white pine becomes orange-ish
(pumpkin wood), cherry is notorious for getting a "sunburn".

As sort of a rule of thumb, lighter woods darken and darker woods lighten over time.

This site has really well done wood pictures:

http://hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/

One caveat. Displaying my ignorance: I was one of those folks who identified seeds and
wood samples at a USDA lab about 50 years ago. Color of wood was not
ever considered a primary property of wood because of the above. Wood
changes color with age.

The person who put together the site did not mention any standard color reference
about wood, but the pictures have the "correct color". I'd love to learn about
that. And how to know what a correct color is by species.

Question: does anyone know if there is an defacto industry standard for the
color of lumber by species? Could you please provide any links you
might have?

I personally don't think there is one. :(
 
Biology news on Phys.org
http://hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/

That's my site and yes, I left out a LOT of things (such as generalizations about wood color) to focus pretty much entirely on correctly colored pics of wood.

Generalizations about wood color are very tough. There ARE some (such as your statement about cherry) that are reasonable, and I have some such in with the specific woods. For example, the cherry fact sheet includes the statement
Cherry's color ages extremely well, deepening and taking on a rich patina with age, particularly with exposure to sunlight.

If you spend much time on the site you will not likely have any trouble believing that I have spend many THOUSANDS of hours on it and my list of things left to do it so long that I'm quite confident I will never finish it.

If you have any specific questions, let me know

Paul
 
Well, you did a very good job. Wood identification: We used to relegate color of wood samples way behind things like resin canals, heartwood/sapwood transitions, microscopic end grain analysis, density and the other stuff like lithocysts. Those can be hell on tool steel. Lots of tropical woods are beautiful, but eat tools for lunch for a variety of reasons.

So, tropical wood imports were rising fasst in 1964, when I stopped playing woodologist. They were becoming commerically important. Now a lot them are becoming commerically unavailable, banak comes to mind

Years ago, I used to teach short classes on this stuff to FFA'ers. A lot of it has melted away.

Phooey.
I thought I was missing something. That cannot happen! Still am a wood freak the past 50 years or or so. Reason I got into Botany to start with.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top