How do I calculate the work done against gravity?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done against gravity, the formula used is Work Done (WD) = mass (m) * gravitational acceleration (g) * height (h). For a 40kg mass pushed up a slope with a height of 3m, the work done against gravity is 1176J. The discussion highlights that work done against gravity and gravitational potential energy (GPE) gained are effectively the same calculation. In a separate example, a 35kg child climbing a wall of height 2.5m also demonstrates this equivalence, as the work done against gravity equals the GPE gained. The confusion arises from the phrasing of different questions, but both concepts yield the same numerical result.
Molly1235
Messages
77
Reaction score
4
Ok, so I have a question for my first AS level assignment:

"A mass of 40kg is pushed up the slope shown opposite in 20 seconds (assume acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2". The slope is 5m, base 4m and height 3m.

It first asks to calculate the work done against gravity.

This confused me as obviously I can't use WD = Force * distance moved in direction of force as it is going the opposite way. So would I be right in thinking (as WD is energy transferred) that you would calculate GPE? (M*G*H)

I did 40 * 9.8 * 3 = 1176J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Molly1235! :smile:

Yep. That's right.
 
Yay! Thank you for confirming! Although there is another question that asks the same thing (work done against gravity) and them asks for GPE which confused me...

"A child of mass 35kg climbs up a wall of height 2.5m and then steps off. Calculate or state (assume acceleration due to g 9.8):

a) work done against gravity by the child

b) GPE gained by the child

Are they not the same thing?
 
Molly1235 said:
Yay! Thank you for confirming! Although there is another question that asks the same thing (work done against gravity) and them asks for GPE which confused me...

"A child of mass 35kg climbs up a wall of height 2.5m and then steps off. Calculate or state (assume acceleration due to g 9.8):

a) work done against gravity by the child

b) GPE gained by the child

Are they not the same thing?

Yep. They are.
What's the confusion?

When the child climbs up she applies force against gravity for an amount of work equal the GPE gained.
When she steps off that GPE is converted to kinetic energy.
 
negatives of each other though, probably neg gpe
 
It just confused me that they'd have the same answer for 2 questions, but I guess it's just to make sure we know what we're doing...ok, thank you very much!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top