Work done by force (Vector notation)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a force represented in vector notation, specifically focusing on a force defined as (2x)i + (3)j N and the movement of a particle between two specified positions. The problem involves understanding the application of work in a physics context and the integration of force over a path.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to calculate work, including parameterizing the path and integrating the force. Questions arise regarding the transition from force components to the integral expression and the role of time in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and clarifying misunderstandings. Some have identified errors in their calculations, while others are seeking clarification on the integration process and the relationship between force, work, and power. There is a mix of interpretations and approaches being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the introduction of time in the problem, as the original question only specifies position. Participants are also questioning the assumptions made in the calculations and the separation of components in the work calculation.

Gold3nlily
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How much work is done by a force= (2x)i N + (3)j N with x in meters, that moves a particle from a position (initial) = (2m)i + (3m)j to a position (final) = (-4m)i + (-3m)j?

Answer:
- 6 J

Homework Equations



Work = integral of Force

The Attempt at a Solution



W = [x^2] i + [3x] j
W = [4^2 - 2^2] i + [3(-3) - 3(3)] j
W = 12 i -18 j
W magnitude = 21.6J

I realize I am doing this wrong becasue the Magnitude will always be positive and the answer (from back of book) is negative.

I tried this in a similar way where I took the difference between the two position vector and then placed it in the integral
rd = (-6) i + (-6) j
Got W = 36 i + 18 j
still wrong.

Help, pretty please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To save typing all the i's and j's, I'll use the notation (2,3) = 2i + 3j. I'll also cut corners by leaving out the units.

Assuming the movement is in a straight line, we can parameterize the particle's path from the initial point (2,3) to the final point (-4,-3) by an equation such as

\mathbf{r}(t) = (x,y) = (2,3) - t(6,6), \enspace 0 \leq t \leq 1.

-(6,6) is the displacement vector from the initial point to the final point, that is, the difference between them.

Then x=2-6t, and

d\mathbf{r} = (dx,dy) = -(6,6) dt.

So

\int_{\mathbf{r}(0)}^{\mathbf{r}(1)} \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r}) \cdot d\mathbf{r}

=\int_{(2,3)}^{(-4,-3)}(2x,3) \cdot (dx,dy) = \int_{0}^{1}(42-72t) \; dt = -6
 
Rasalhague said:
=\int_{(2,3)}^{(-4,-3)}(2x,3) \cdot (dx,dy) = \int_{0}^{1}(42-72t) \; dt = -6

Thank you Rasalhague. But how did you get from (2x,3) to (42-72t)? I don't understand.
 
Oopsh, sorry, I missed out a minus in front of the integral on the right. Are the following steps clear?

x = 2 - 6t

(2x,3) = (2(2-6t),3) = (4-12t,3)

(4-12t,3) \cdot (-6,-6) = -6(4-12t) - 18 = -42 + 72t.[/itex]<br /> <br /> -(6,6) comes from differentiating \mathbf{r}.
 
Rasalhague said:
Oopsh, sorry, I missed out a minus in front of the integral on the right. Are the following steps clear?

x = 2 - 6t

(2x,3) = (2(2-6t),3) = (4-12t,3)

(4-12t,3) \cdot (-6,-6) = -6(4-12t) - 18 = -42 + 72t.[/itex]<br /> <br /> -(6,6) comes from differentiating \mathbf{r}.
<br /> <br /> Hi Rasalhague. Thank you for helping me. <br /> <br /> My test is this Wednesday, but I have lots of other tests so sorry about the delay. <br /> <br /> A couple things:<br /> <br /> 1) where did time come from? The question never mentioned it- only position. <br /> <br /> 2) I understand this:<br /> r = (-6) i + (-6) j <br /> r = -(6,6)<br /> <br /> 3) where does this come from: x=2-6t (I think this is an extension of being confused about the time)?<br /> <br /> Why is integral not (x^2)i + (3x) j ?<br /> <br /> Thank you again for your help and I am sorry if I am difficult.
 
The reason time confuses me is that isn't POWER change in work over time? I thought the difference between Force and power is whether your taking the derivative of work with respect to time or with respect to position...?
 
Okay, I figured out what I did wrong. I had this part right:

W = [x^2] i + [3x] j
W = [4^2 - 2^2] i + [3(-3) - 3(3)] j
W = 12 i -18 j

What I needed to do was subtract 18 from 12
W = 12 - 18 = -6 (answer!)

I wasn't doing this becasue I thought they were sepearte becasue of the separate components. Wow, I can't believe I was so close for so long!

I still don't completely understand why you just add i and j together to find work instead of finding the magnitude... but it works for many similar book problems so I know this is the right way to do it.

Thanks for the help. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K