Work done by the gravitational force

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by gravitational force in spherical coordinates, the line element must be expressed as dℓ = dr ȷ̂ + r dθ ȷ̆ + r sin θ dφ ȷ̄. The 1-form becomes ω = Fr dr + Fθ r dθ + Fφ r sin θ dφ. The integral for work done can be expressed as ∫γ ω = ∫(t0 to t1) (Fr (dr/dt) + Fθ r (dθ/dt) + Fφ r sin θ (dφ/dt)) dt. It is noted that the work done in a gravitational field can be simplified to the difference in potential energies between two points, focusing primarily on the radial direction. Understanding these integrations and transformations is crucial for accurate calculations in gravitational contexts.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi there!
I'd like to calculate the work done by the gravitational force. I know the work is defined by the integration of a 1-form:
L=\int_\gamma \omega
where
\omega=F_xdx+F_ydy+F_zdz

This works fine in cartesian coordinates and I know how to integrate it, but what if I want to use spherical coordinates?
Then I'd have:
\omega=F_rdr+F_{\theta}d{\theta}+F_{\phi}{d\phi}=F_rdr
Suppose \gamma is a curve defined in spherical coordinates (i.e. \vec\gamma=R(t)\hat r+\Theta(t)\hat\theta+\Phi(t)\hat\phi),
how do I integrate the 1-form along \gamma?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eoghan said:
\omega=F_rdr+F_{\theta}d{\theta}+F_{\phi}{d\phi}=F_rdr

No, you need to use the line element in spherical coordinates:

d \vec l = dr \hat r + r d\theta \hat \theta + r \sin \theta d\phi \hat \phi

so that

\omega = F_r dr + F_\theta r d\theta + F_\phi r \sin \theta d\phi

Now, what are F_r, F_\theta, and F_\phi?
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
No, you need to use the line element in spherical coordinates:

d \vec l = dr \hat r + r d\theta \hat \theta + r \sin \theta d\phi \hat \phi

so that

\omega = F_r dr + F_\theta r d\theta + F_\phi r \sin \theta d\phi

Now, what are F_r, F_\theta, and F_\phi?

Then the integral is like this?

\int_\gamma \omega = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \vec F \cdot\frac{d\vec l}{dt}dt=\int_{t_0}^{t_1} \left( F_r\frac{dr}{dt}+F_\theta r \frac{d\theta}{dt}+F_\phi rsin\theta\frac{d\phi}{dt}\right)dt
 
Wouldn't the work done when moving between two points in a gravitational field just be the difference between the potential energies at those two points? You'd really only need to worry about the up direction...or r in spherical polar coordinates...if the coordinate origin is the Earth's center.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top