Work done during quasi-static, isothermal expansion from P_i to P_f

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of work done during a quasi-static, isothermal expansion from initial pressure P_i to final pressure P_f. The original calculation used the integral of pressure with respect to volume, leading to a work expression of W=nRT ln(P_f/P_i). However, the calculated value of -7294 J differs significantly from the book's answer of -3.17 x 10^3 J, prompting a review of the conversion of temperature to Kelvin. A participant points out a typo in the equation for volume, clarifying that the correct equation should be V=nRT/P, not V=-nRT/P. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful unit conversion and correct application of the ideal gas law.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
(a) Show that the work done by an ideal gas during the quasi-static, isothermal expansion from an initial pressure ##P_i## to a final pressure ##P_f## is given by

$$W=nRT\ln\frac{P_f}{P_i}$$

(b) Calculate the work done when the pressure of 1 mol of an ideal gas is decreased quasi-statically from 20 to 1 atm, the temperature remaining constant at ##20^{\circ} C## (##R=8.31 J/mol\cdot deg##).
Relevant Equations
##W=-\int_{V_i}^{V_f} PdV##
I am posting this question after I thought I had easily solved the problem, but then when I checked the back of the book I saw that I was incorrect.

Here is what I did.

(a)

$$W=-\int_{V_i}^{V_f} PdV\tag{1}$$

$$V=V(P,T)-\frac{nRT}{P}\tag{2}$$

$$dV=\left ( \frac{\partial V}{\partial P}\right )_T dP+\left ( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right )_P dT\tag{3}$$

$$=\frac{-nRT}{P^2}dP\tag{4}$$

Now we plug (4) into (1)

$$W=\int_{P_i}^{P_f} \frac{nRT}{P}dP=nRT\ln{\frac{P_f}{P_i}}\tag{5}$$

(b)

At this point I simply plugged the values into (5)

$$W=1\text{mol}\cdot 8.31 \mathrm{\frac{J}{mol ^\circ C}}\cdot 20^{\circ} \text{C}\cdot \ln{\frac{1\text{atm}}{20\text{atm}}}\tag{6}$$

$$=-7294\text{J}\tag{7}$$

The book answer says ##-3.17\times 10^3## J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
(b)

At this point I simply plugged the values into (5)

$$W=1\text{mol}\cdot 8.31 \mathrm{\frac{J}{mol ^\circ C}}\cdot 20^{\circ} \text{C}\cdot \ln{\frac{1\text{atm}}{20\text{atm}}}\tag{6}$$

$$=-7294\text{J}\tag{7}$$

The book answer says ##-3.17\times 10^3## J.
Be careful: indicate that you converted the 20 °C to kelvin. Otherwise, I get the same answer as you.
 
zenterix said:
$$W=-\int_{V_i}^{V_f} PdV\tag{1}$$

$$V=V(P,T)-\frac{nRT}{P}\tag{2}$$
Where did you get Eqn. 2 from?

Incidentally, you could have done the initial derivation differently by using the product rule for differentiation: $$PdV=d(PV)-VdP$$At constant temperature, d(PV)=nRdT=0, so, at constant temperature, $$PdV=-VdP=-\frac{nRT}{P}dp$$
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix and MatinSAR
DrClaude said:
Be careful: indicate that you converted the 20 °C to kelvin. Otherwise, I get the same answer as you.
Indeed, I did use Kelvin.
 
Chestermiller said:
Where did you get Eqn. 2 from?

Incidentally, you could have done the initial derivation differently by using the product rule for differentiation: $$PdV=d(PV)-VdP$$At constant temperature, d(PV)=nRdT=0, so, at constant temperature, $$PdV=-VdP=-\frac{nRT}{P}dp$$
Equation 2 comes from the equation of state for ideal gases. I think you may be asking because of the typo I have in that equation.

It should be

$$V=V(P,T)=\frac{nRT}{P}$$

I accidentally had a minus sign in place of the second equals sign.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K