Work done for an adiabatic process

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the work done during an adiabatic process, specifically addressing the equation V^{\gamma}P = C. The work done is initially stated as W = -P ΔV, but an alternative expression derived from the adiabatic equation is presented: W = \frac{C}{1-\gamma}\left[ V^{1-\gamma}_{f} - V^{1-\gamma}_{i} \right]. The conversation highlights the importance of the quasi-static assumption in the derivation, clarifying that W = -P dV is used for infinitesimal changes. Further exploration of the quasi-static process is requested for deeper understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic processes, specifically adiabatic processes.
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas law and its applications.
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration and differentiation in physical contexts.
  • Concept of quasi-static processes in thermodynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the adiabatic process equations in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of quasi-static processes in thermodynamics.
  • Explore the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature in adiabatic processes.
  • Investigate real-world applications of adiabatic processes in engineering and physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of energy transfer in adiabatic processes.

A_B
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In deriving the equation for adiabats : [itex]V^{\gamma}P = C[/itex]. It is assumed that the work done during the process is [itex]W = -P \Delta V[/itex].

But calculating the work done from [itex]V^{\gamma}P = C[/itex] we obtain:

[tex]W = \frac{C}{1-\gamma}\left[ V^{1-\gamma}_{f} - V^{1-\gamma}_{i} \right][/tex].

Also, i believe to have heard that the assumption used for the derivation ([itex]W = -P \Delta V[/itex]) is due to the assumption that the process is quasi-static, how does that work exactly?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
whoops, never mind, the derivation uses [itex]W = -P dV[/itex] for an infinitesimal change, that makes sense, but I'd still like some more info on what a quasi-static process means and where in the derivation it's used.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K