Work done on dipole and potential energy in uniform electric field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the work done on a dipole in a uniform electric field and the relationship between work and potential energy. The torque on a dipole is defined as τ=PEsinθ, and the work done when moving a dipole from angle θ0 to θ1 is expressed as W=PE[cosθ0 - cosθ1]. The change in potential energy, ΔU, is equivalent to the work done, leading to the conclusion that W=ΔU when considering work done by an external agent. The confusion arises regarding the sign of work done by conservative forces, where W=-ΔU applies when the force acts against the displacement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dipole moment and torque in electric fields
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts in physics
  • Knowledge of conservative forces and their properties
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and dipole dynamics in electric fields
  • Explore the relationship between work and potential energy in conservative systems
  • Learn about the implications of negative work in physics
  • Investigate the role of external forces in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of dipoles and the principles of work and energy in electric fields.

ShaunPereira
Messages
40
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Finding out relevant equation for work done on a dipole and its potential energy.
Relevant Equations
$$ W= -\Delta U $$
$$ U= -PEsin\theta $$
I encountered a problem regarding the appropriate sign needed to be taken for the work done on a dipole when it rotates in a uniform electric field and would appreciate some help.

The torque on a dipole can be defined as
τ=PEsinθ
The work done on a dipole to move it from an angle ##\theta_0## to an angle ##\theta_1## can be written as the integral of ##\tau.dr## from ##\theta_0## to ##\theta_1##
which is PE[cos##\theta_0##- ##\theta_1## ]

The change in potential energy would be ##U_2 -U_1##
=##-PEcos\theta_1## -(-##PEcos\theta_0##)
=##PEcos\theta_0##- ##PEcos\theta_1##
=PE[cos##\theta_0##- ##\theta_1## ]

If we compare the equations obtained for work done and the change in potential they both are the same which make sense since the change in potential energy would be the work done.

But this is where my problem begins. Isn't the work done negative of the change in potential energy due to a conservative force?
If yes why is ##W= \Delta U## here and not ##W= -\Delta U##
I know this sound silly but does it make a difference?
I have encountered problems with multiple choices where the sign mattered and wasn't sure which one to choose.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's talk about a simpler situation, doing work lifting a brick. If ##F## is the force you apply to the brick, then the work you do on the brick is,

##W = F\cdot \Delta S##

where ##\Delta S## is the vector displacement of the brick. Well, to move the brick up you must push up. Both ##F## and ##\Delta S## are in the same direction so the work is positive. If the brick started at rest and is at rest when you finish lifting it, then ##W## is the change in the potential energy.

If you stop pushing on the brick, it will fall acted upon by a force,

##F = -\nabla U.##

The minus sign makes sense because the force must undo the increase of potential energy put in by lifting.
 
Paul Colby said:
Let's talk about a simpler situation, doing work lifting a brick. If ##F## is the force you apply to the brick, then the work you do on the brick is,

##W = F\cdot \Delta S##

where ##\Delta S## is the vector displacement of the brick. Well, to move the brick up you must push up. Both ##F## and ##\Delta S## are in the same direction so the work is positive. If the brick started at rest and is at rest when you finish lifting it, then ##W## is the change in the potential energy.

If you stop pushing on the brick, it will fall acted upon by a force,

##F = -\nabla U.##

The minus sign makes sense because the force must undo the increase of potential energy put in by lifting.
Right so if I understood you correctly then what you essentially mean is:
The sign depends on who is doing the work
IF it is by an external agent who lifts the brick, both the the force and the displacement are in the same direction and hence the work done by it is positive and the work done by it is simply the change in potential energy.

However the gravitational force of the Earth on the brick and displacement are in the opposite direction leading to negative work being done by the force which is the negative of change in potential energy.

Please clarify if the above conclusion is right or wrong.

ALSO
I just read the question that I was talking about that had multiple options
and it asked me to find the work done by the external agent to turn the dipole which would essentially be the change in potential energy.

given by $$W=\Delta U$$

Had they asked the work done by the electric field to turn the dipole through some angle I'd assume it would be

$$W=-\Delta U$$

Is this correct?
 
Ok. Thank You.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
638
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K