Work done on dipole and potential energy in uniform electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the sign of work done on a dipole in a uniform electric field and its relationship with potential energy. It is clarified that the work done by an external agent to rotate the dipole is equal to the change in potential energy, expressed as W = ΔU. Conversely, the work done by the electric field on the dipole is negative of the change in potential energy, W = -ΔU. The distinction is made that the sign of work depends on whether it is performed by an external agent or by the electric field itself. This understanding resolves the initial confusion about the signs in the context of conservative forces.
ShaunPereira
Messages
40
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Finding out relevant equation for work done on a dipole and its potential energy.
Relevant Equations
$$ W= -\Delta U $$
$$ U= -PEsin\theta $$
I encountered a problem regarding the appropriate sign needed to be taken for the work done on a dipole when it rotates in a uniform electric field and would appreciate some help.

The torque on a dipole can be defined as
τ=PEsinθ
The work done on a dipole to move it from an angle ##\theta_0## to an angle ##\theta_1## can be written as the integral of ##\tau.dr## from ##\theta_0## to ##\theta_1##
which is PE[cos##\theta_0##- ##\theta_1## ]

The change in potential energy would be ##U_2 -U_1##
=##-PEcos\theta_1## -(-##PEcos\theta_0##)
=##PEcos\theta_0##- ##PEcos\theta_1##
=PE[cos##\theta_0##- ##\theta_1## ]

If we compare the equations obtained for work done and the change in potential they both are the same which make sense since the change in potential energy would be the work done.

But this is where my problem begins. Isn't the work done negative of the change in potential energy due to a conservative force?
If yes why is ##W= \Delta U## here and not ##W= -\Delta U##
I know this sound silly but does it make a difference?
I have encountered problems with multiple choices where the sign mattered and wasn't sure which one to choose.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's talk about a simpler situation, doing work lifting a brick. If ##F## is the force you apply to the brick, then the work you do on the brick is,

##W = F\cdot \Delta S##

where ##\Delta S## is the vector displacement of the brick. Well, to move the brick up you must push up. Both ##F## and ##\Delta S## are in the same direction so the work is positive. If the brick started at rest and is at rest when you finish lifting it, then ##W## is the change in the potential energy.

If you stop pushing on the brick, it will fall acted upon by a force,

##F = -\nabla U.##

The minus sign makes sense because the force must undo the increase of potential energy put in by lifting.
 
Paul Colby said:
Let's talk about a simpler situation, doing work lifting a brick. If ##F## is the force you apply to the brick, then the work you do on the brick is,

##W = F\cdot \Delta S##

where ##\Delta S## is the vector displacement of the brick. Well, to move the brick up you must push up. Both ##F## and ##\Delta S## are in the same direction so the work is positive. If the brick started at rest and is at rest when you finish lifting it, then ##W## is the change in the potential energy.

If you stop pushing on the brick, it will fall acted upon by a force,

##F = -\nabla U.##

The minus sign makes sense because the force must undo the increase of potential energy put in by lifting.
Right so if I understood you correctly then what you essentially mean is:
The sign depends on who is doing the work
IF it is by an external agent who lifts the brick, both the the force and the displacement are in the same direction and hence the work done by it is positive and the work done by it is simply the change in potential energy.

However the gravitational force of the Earth on the brick and displacement are in the opposite direction leading to negative work being done by the force which is the negative of change in potential energy.

Please clarify if the above conclusion is right or wrong.

ALSO
I just read the question that I was talking about that had multiple options
and it asked me to find the work done by the external agent to turn the dipole which would essentially be the change in potential energy.

given by $$W=\Delta U$$

Had they asked the work done by the electric field to turn the dipole through some angle I'd assume it would be

$$W=-\Delta U$$

Is this correct?
 
Ok. Thank You.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top