Work-energy principle and conservative forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the work-energy principle, specifically the equation W = F * X, which is a simplified case of the integral W = ∫ F dx. It explains that when force is constant, work can be calculated as W = F (x_f - x_i), where x_f and x_i are the final and initial positions. The conversation also highlights the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces, emphasizing that the total work accounts for all forces acting on a particle in equilibrium. Additionally, it introduces the relationship between work done by conservative forces and potential energy, expressed as Wc = -dV. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the equations presented.
mech-eng
Messages
825
Reaction score
13
Hi, all there are equation in the pic but I can't understand them. I know work-energy principle which
is W= F * X (work equals force times way) but I think they are special forms. What concepts
and topics should I study to understand them?
 

Attachments

  • equation about conservative forces and work.png
    equation about conservative forces and work.png
    29 KB · Views: 714
Physics news on Phys.org
W = F*x is a special case of the integral:

W = \int F dx

if F is not dependent on x, then we can write:

W = F \int_{x_i}^{x_f} dx

and that's just

W = F (x_f - x_i)

The x you use is the distance moved, which is just the difference between the final and initial position, as I have written.

The equation you show accounts for all forces on a particle and breaks them into conservative and non-conservative forces and assumes the particle is in equilibrium, setting that sum of forces to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The text also makes use of the definition of potential energy difference dV in terms of the work done by a conservative force Wc= - dV
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top