Work-Energy Theorem: Bar, Resistor, & Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a test question involving a bar, resistor, and magnetic field, where the bar accelerates downwards due to gravity until it reaches terminal velocity. The key points include the confusion about calculating power dissipated through the resistor and the work done by gravity after achieving terminal velocity. It is clarified that while the current is constant and does not equal zero, the power dissipated is calculated as mgv, where v is the terminal velocity. The work done by gravity is indeed mgh, despite no change in kinetic energy, as potential energy changes during the bar's descent. The participants express uncertainty about the role of gravity versus magnetic forces in power dissipation, highlighting a gap in their understanding of the concepts involved.
Dahaka14
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Okay, I just took a test where there was a loop with a bar and a resistor in a magnetic field going into the screen as follows
____/\/\/\_____
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
l____(bar)_____lxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx

where the bar starts at rest, and begins to accelerate vertically down due to gravity. We were asked to find the final velocity (which I understand), and then AFTER IT HAS REACHED TERMINAL VELOCITY find the power dissipated through the resistor as a function of time and the work done by gravity as a function of time.

At first I set P=IR^2, and solved using the terminal velocity I found. But then I thought that the current isn't changing, because the velocity is constant, so I assumed it would be zero. I am very shaky on this one, and it's probably wrong, right?
Then, for the work done by gravity, I set W(t)=mgh=mgvt. But then I remembered the work-energy theorem, and there is no change in kinetic energy due to its constant velocity, and there is no net force on it anyhow. What are the answers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dahaka14 said:
Okay, I just took a test where there was a loop with a bar and a resistor in a magnetic field going into the screen as follows
____/\/\/\_____
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
l____(bar)_____lxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx
lxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxxx

where the bar starts at rest, and begins to accelerate vertically down due to gravity. We were asked to find the final velocity (which I understand), and then AFTER IT HAS REACHED TERMINAL VELOCITY find the power dissipated through the resistor as a function of time and the work done by gravity as a function of time.

At first I set P=IR^2, and solved using the terminal velocity I found. But then I thought that the current isn't changing, because the velocity is constant, so I assumed it would be zero. I am very shaky on this one, and it's probably wrong, right?
I don't understand your sentence.What is "it" when you say "it should be zero"??
If the current is constant it does not mean it must be zero!
Then, for the work done by gravity, I set W(t)=mgh=mgvt. But then I remembered the work-energy theorem, and there is no change in kinetic energy due to its constant velocity, and there is no net force on it anyhow. What are the answers?
There is no net force and the net work is zero. But you are asked to find the work done by gravity alone and this is certianly not zero!

The work done by gravity is mgh indeed. The power is mg dh/dt = mgv.
 
I typed too short of a post. I meant 0 for both the power dissipated and work done by gravity. I see your point about work done BY GRAVITY, I was just confused by thinking about the work-energy theorem with respect to the system. This is one concept that I've never really gotten a solid ground on; if there is no change in kinetic energy, then how is there work done by gravity? I ask this because last semester there was a question posed to the class during lecture saying that if one moves a box from the ground to a table, there is no work done by gravity because the change in kinetic energy is zero. I first responded that there was work done by gravity because there was a change in potential energy due to its position in the field, but he said I was wrong...

Now your answer to the power dissipated in the resistor...are we only considering gravity when we say that P=Fv? What about the magnetic field's force? How do we determine to use gravity as the source of the power dissipation? This was on our exam and we never went over this concept.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top