Work & Gravity: How to Lift a 5 kg Box 1 Meter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ziaharipur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Work
AI Thread Summary
To lift a 5 kg box one meter, the work done against gravity is calculated using the formula Work = mgh, resulting in 49 joules. Although an initial force greater than the weight is needed to accelerate the box, this force is only applied briefly. The acceleration and deceleration phases effectively cancel each other out, allowing the total work done to be simplified to just mgh. Thus, while the force applied varies during lifting, the net work required remains 49 joules. The discussion emphasizes that for practical calculations, the complexities of acceleration can be ignored since they do not affect the total work done.
ziaharipur
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am quoting a text from a web sight before my question.

"Let's assume we have a 5 kg box on the floor. Let's arbitrarily call its current potential energy zero, just to give us a reference point. If we do work to lift the box one meter off the floor, we need to overcome the force of gravity on the box (its weight) over a distance of one meter. Therefore, the work we do on the box can be obtained from:
Work=Fd =mgh=(5)(9.8)(1) =49J "

My Question here is, if you apply F=mg on the box the box will stay at rest then how it can be lifted 1 meter?
In the answer if you say that you have to apply a little more force (F1) to produce acceleration in the body then my counter question will be, This means we are not applying constant force on the body first we apply a little more force on the body to produce acceleration and then we reduce the force to mg, if this is the case then to calculate the work we first need to calculate the work done by F1 (the little more force to produce acceleration) let's call it W1 then we need to calculate the work done by the force mg let's call it W2 and the total work will be W=W1+W2. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ziaharipur said:
I am quoting a text from a web sight before my question.

"Let's assume we have a 5 kg box on the floor. Let's arbitrarily call its current potential energy zero, just to give us a reference point. If we do work to lift the box one meter off the floor, we need to overcome the force of gravity on the box (its weight) over a distance of one meter. Therefore, the work we do on the box can be obtained from:
Work=Fd =mgh=(5)(9.8)(1) =49J "

My Question here is, if you apply F=mg on the box the box will stay at rest then how it can be lifted 1 meter?
In the answer if you say that you have to apply a little more force (F1) to produce acceleration in the body then my counter question will be, This means we are not applying constant force on the body first we apply a little more force on the body to produce acceleration and then we reduce the force to mg, if this is the case then to calculate the work we first need to calculate the work done by F1 (the little more force to produce acceleration) let's call it W1 then we need to calculate the work done by the force mg let's call it W2 and the total work will be W=W1+W2. Am I right?

Sure, but in this problem we are just ignoring the contribution from F1 for simplicity, since it is small (i.e. you spend a very small amount of time accelerating the box up to the chosen constant speed at which you're going to lift it). EDIT: actually it gets canceled out by the little bit of deceleration at the end that you use to bring the box to a stop once you've reached the final height. You see, if the box goes from 0 to h, and is at rest at the start and the end, then its change in energy HAS TO be mgh, which means the work done in the end has to be mgh. That's why you can safely ignore the acceleration and deceleration parts, because you know that in the end the work done during those two phases must cancel each other out.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top