Hey guys,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I haven't posted on here for quite a while, so hello to everybody.

I've been trying to derive the stress-energy tensor for the ghost LaGrangian:

[tex] \int d^2 \sigma \sqrt{g} \left( b_{\alpha\beta} \nabla^\alpha c^{\beta} + \omega b^{\alpha\beta} g_{\alpha\beta} \right)[/tex]

for quite a while now. It is a conformal field theory and to word out the central charge the most efficient way is through the T(z)T(w) OPE. Both fields, b and c, are anticommuting. b is a symmetric tensor. [tex]\omega[/tex] is a Lagrange multiplier to enforce the tracelessness of b. I've got tantalisingly close, but no cigar. So really need some help here ;).

Firstly, I gauge fixed the WS metric to be a flat one, so that [tex]\nabla^\alpha c^{\beta} = \partial^{\alpha} c^{\beta} [/tex].

Now you can proceed two ways.

1) Couple the theory to gravity (which involves reinstating the covariant derivative), and vary the metric. This gives a symmetric SE tensor. This I have done, and it works out fine.

2) Peform an infinitesimal change in the coordinates [tex]x^\mu \rightarrow x^\mu + \epsilon^\mu (x)[/tex]. The change in the action will be of the form

[tex]\int d^2 \sigma T_{\alpha\beta} \partial^\alpha \epsilon^\beta[/tex],

so you can read off the SE tensor.

The method I want to make work is the second (because I'm stubborn and want to do it both ways).

In complex coordinates, I get:

[tex] T_{zz} \equiv T = b\partial c + c \partial b [/tex] .

Compare this with the correct result, as quoted in Polchinski, BBS, Steve Tong's DAMTP notes:

[tex] T_{zz} \equiv T = 2 \partial c b + c \partial b [/tex] .

Now the tensor obtained this method is not symmetric, so there are things you can add to it to make it so. But I don't think I've found the 'right thing' to bring it into the standard symmetric form. Nor do I know how much this matters the context of the CFT. By adding various things conserved quantities to the the SE tensor I've found quite a few different forms. Can they all be used in the CFT OPEs, to find the central charge, etc? I'm a bit worried that I can find quite so many different forms for a single object.

Thanks for listening to my rambling. I know it's reasonably technical, but I've been stuck on it for weeks, so any help is appreciated. I've check my calculation as best I can, although there are quite a few terms (e.g. from the tensor transformations of b and c),so it's open to error.

Ideas anybody? Some of these mentor bods floating around? ;)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Worldsheet ghost stress-energy tensor

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**