Would a knot in a falling chain make a difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Falling
AI Thread Summary
A knotted chain falling onto a table will behave differently than an unknotted chain. When the knot hits the table, it will cause the chain to fall to one side rather than straight down. Each link in the chain falls at the same speed, meaning they will not all hit the table simultaneously. The impact of the knot could slow down the chain if the force of the falling chain exceeds the table's resistance. Overall, the presence of a knot alters the dynamics of the falling chain significantly.
Mins
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
While I was looking up about free falling chain problem(the question about a chain falling on to a table), I wondered how it would be if the chain is knotted. What I'm thinking is that if the chain has a knot, would it make much difference?

Two questions;

1) Once the knot hits the table, would it fall to one side or would it just keep falling in a straight line? (in real life)

2) Wouldn't the knot's area and mass be too big that the force from hitting the table would slow the chain down, when the knot hits the table?

I'm not that advanced in physics so it would be helpful if you can tell me everything that could change:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide some more information about the problem you're looking at, and what exactly you're wondering will happen... I'm not following you so far.
 
When the knot hits the table, it's going to fall to one side. Now it's going to fall straight down until it hits the table. In fact, the chain is going to retain the same shape it initially had when you let go of it. Do you understand what I mean? Every link in the chain will fall at the same speed, so that means no two links will hit the table at the same time.

The only way the table isn't going to stop the chain is if the force of the chain falling is greater than the resistance of the table.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top