Would anything change electric charges could be complex numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical possibility of electric charges being represented as complex numbers rather than strictly positive or negative values. It draws an analogy with the Argand diagram, suggesting that just as complex numbers encompass a range of values, electric charges could potentially exist in a spectrum. However, current quantum electrodynamics (QED) only accommodates real charges, necessitating a complete reworking of existing theories to include complex charges. The conversation raises questions about why electric charges are limited to positive and negative and whether exploring this concept could address unresolved issues in physics. Ultimately, the inquiry reflects a desire to deepen understanding of the fundamental nature of electric charge.
Nick Kelly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider an Argand diagram that shows the number line (positive and negative) and the imaginary plane of other possibilities.

As in, we have numbers that are positive and negative, and through complex numbers all of the polarities in between.

I am using this as an analogy, because we have experimentally observed particles and antiparticles; mass with positive and negative charges.

Can anybody point me in the direction of work that has theorized the possibility of electrical charges that are neither positive nor negative, but rather values in-between?

Either that or perhaps explain why it isn't possible?

Conceptually this seems to be a perfect fit with Klein's notion of dimensions wrapped up within our three dimensions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric charge is either positive or negative. That's the way it is.
 


mathman said:
Electric charge is either positive or negative. That's the way it is.

Thank you, but is it valid to ask why it's just the way it is?

I mean, obviously there is no point inventing possibilities for the sake of it; and I know that we have only ever observed positive or negative charges.

My question is really: if you take on the theoretical possibility of charges that are neither positive nor negative; then isn't it useful for changing the equations of QED to account for some of the features that are still problematic?

I am still trying to get my head around the physics, which is why I wanted to post to the forum to see if anybody could help out with this thinking, but I suspect that I need to make the ideas a lot clearer before that point.
 
QED does not permit complex charges, only real ones. You would need to develop an entirely different theory with different equations.
 
Thank you, I shall begin taking the requisite steps to address the deep chasms of my naivete so that I can take this on as a serious problem.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top