B Would we be able to completely stop time?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tryannosaurus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of stopping time through an object with infinitely strong gravitational pull, questioning if time would completely halt around it. It clarifies that time does not stop near a black hole but experiences gravitational time dilation, where time appears to slow for an observer outside the gravitational field. An observer near a singularity would not witness the entire universe's lifespan but would instead experience a finite amount of time before reaching the singularity. Additionally, hovering just outside the event horizon would require significant acceleration, making it impractical for observing future events. The complexities of general relativity highlight that the idea of stopping time is oversimplified and not feasible.
Tryannosaurus
We know that time slows down around a black hole due to its immense gravitational pull that "streches" time, but for the sake of this thread let's say we were able to have an object that had a infinitely strong gravitational pull, would this stop time for good?

Imagine that we created something that could have an infinitely strong gravitational pull but it would only last for 5 seconds, would time around that object completely stop? Then would the 5 seconds it would last for be forever around the object? Would the 5 seconds even matter no that time stopped?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Tryannosaurus said:
We know that time slows down around a black hole due to its immense gravitational pull that "streches" time
This is quite an oversimplification.

It is also not clear what you would mean by "infinite gravitational pull". In GR, gravity is the geometry of space-time, not a force.
 
Time doesn't slow down near a black hole, that would be gravitational time dilation. Your clock will still tick at 1 second per second.
 
That answer misses the mark a bit. An observer adjacent to the singularity would observe the external universe age at an accelerated rate, perhaps its entire lifetime, during that second.
 
Noel said:
That answer misses the mark a bit. An observer adjacent to the singularity would observe the external universe age at an accelerated rate, perhaps its entire lifetime, during that second.
In this case, you have missed the mark. An observer adjacent to the singularity will reach the singularity in a finite (and fairly short) amount of proper time. This observer will not see the entire lifetime of the universe, and in fact the last thing he will see is light that crossed the horizon very shortly after he did.

An observer hovering outside of the event horizon (the horizon and the singularity are different things, of course) can see the entire lifetime of the universe, but only the same way that everyone else can - stick around long enough and you'll get to see everything.
 
  • Like
Likes elusiveshame
Nugatory said:
An observer hovering outside of the event horizon (the horizon and the singularity are different things, of course) can see the entire lifetime of the universe, but only the same way that everyone else can - stick around long enough and you'll get to see everything.
It should also be mentioned that hovering "just outside" the horizon would require a large proper acceleration, which would somehow have to be imparted on such an observer. The observer would also have to be able to withstand said acceleration. Not a viable way of using gravitational time dilation to see what happens in the future.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top