Write an expression for the Optical path length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving expressions for the Optical Path Length (OPL) of rays passing through a converging lens with specific parameters. For part (a), the user correctly applies the Pythagorean theorem to find the OPL for the ray at the edge of the lens. In part (b), the user formulates the OPL for the ray through the center but miscalculates when squaring both sides of the equation in part (c). A participant points out that the user needs to remember that the square of a sum is not simply the sum of squares, which is crucial for solving the equation accurately. The conversation highlights the importance of careful mathematical manipulation in optical calculations.
goodo
Hi,

I'm hoping I can get some help. (I'm a first time poster, so if there's something that isn't quite clear, please let me know).

A converging lens (n=1.355) in air has diameter 4.0cm, thickness 0.50cm and zero thickness at its edges.

A point object at 'So' = 18cm has an image at 'Si'= x cm. (where 'So' and 'Si' are distances from the center of the lens)

(a) Write an expression for the Optical path length (OPL) of the ray passing through the edge of the lens and (b) an expression for the OPL of the ray passing through the centre of the lens, and (c) determine the distance x.

(sqrt= square root, sq = squared) For (a) I used pythagorus. OPL = sqrt(18 sq + 2 sq) + sqrt(x sq + 2 sq)

(b) OPL = 17.75 +(x-0.25) + 0.5n
=17.5+x+.6775
=18.1775+x
=18.18+x

(c) Now I have both in term of x. Since OPL1=OPL2,
sqrt(18 sq + 2 sq) + sqrt(x sq + 2 sq)=18.18+x
(square both sides) 18 sq + 4 + x sq + 4 = 18.18 sq + x sq
332 + x sq = 330.5 + x sq

I can't think of any other way to do it, yet something must be wrong as I have to calculate x. Is there a reason why I'm 1.5 off other than rounding? Wouldn't the x sq both cancel out leaving me with nothing?

Thanks
goodo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome goodo,
I think everything's OK up to here:
sqrt(18 sq + 2 sq) + sqrt(x sq + 2 sq)=18.18+x
(square both sides) 18 sq + 4 + x sq + 4 = 18.18 sq + x sq
The square of a sum is not the sum of squares.
Remember: (a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2.

BTW, the 1st root has no x, so you can calculate its value. Makes things easier...
 
Last edited:
Thansk for your response arcnets.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top