X-rays and gamma rays are both forms of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation, but they are classified differently based on their production mechanisms. X-rays are produced when electrons transition between energy levels, while gamma rays are emitted during nuclear processes. Although both types of radiation overlap in the electromagnetic spectrum, the distinction is primarily historical and based on their sources rather than strict energy levels or wavelengths. Energy in this context is directly related to frequency, not amplitude, which is a common misconception.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, researchers in quantum mechanics, and professionals in medical imaging or radiation safety will benefit from this discussion on the distinctions between X-rays and gamma rays.
The other ranges don't have completely clear borders either.mrbearing said:i just thought that since all other waves in the spectrum had a definite classification
Energy (in the discussion here) depends on frequency, not amplitude. In general there are no sharp dividing lines between different types. For example infrared and microwaves don't have a sharp distinction.mrbearing said:Thanks, i just thought that since all other waves in the spectrum had a definite classification it was somewhat strange that 2 different waves can technically be classed as the same thing in terms of 2 fundamental things that make up a wave (being wavelength and frequency) I still don't understand fully the concept of the energy of a wave although i do know it is related to its amplitude. I just thought amplitude might be the key difference but if it can also be defined from the production mechanism that may not be the case.
It does, but it is not related to the energy per photon - which is usually the implied meaning of "high-energetic rays" or similar phrases.mrbearing said:So does the amplitude of the wave have nothing to do with energy.