X to the xth power and other indices

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcsd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the functions xy = yx and y = xx, exploring the relationship between x and y. For the equation xy = yx, it is noted that y can be expressed in terms of x, but an elementary closed-form solution is unlikely. The minimum value of x in the function y = xx occurs at x = 1/e, approximately 0.368, where the derivative dy/dx equals zero. The function f(t) = ln t / t is analyzed, revealing that it has at most two solutions for given values of z, depending on its range. Overall, while some solutions are identified, the complexity of the equations suggests that not all solutions may be easily determined.
jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
13
Recently I've considering the two functions xy= yx and y = xx.

1) For xy= yx can y be found in terms of x? I'm sure I've seen such a solution before.

2) In y = xx when y (and therefore x)is postive what value of y gives the minium value for x? I know it's rougly 0.45 and that dy/dx = 0 at this point, but it's a long time since I've done more advanced differentiation and I don't even know if you can differentiate xx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2)

y(x) = xx
ln y(x) = x ln x

(1 / y(x)) * y'(x) = 1 * ln x + x (1 / x)
y'(x) = y(x) (1 + ln x)
y'(x) = xx(1 + ln x)

Since xx > 0, y'(x) can be 0 iff
1 + ln x = 0
ln x = -1
x = 1/e

So the minimum of xx occurs at x = 1/e = 0.368


1)

y = x

Ok, ok, that's not the only solution. I highly doubt there is an elementary solution for this, but I can get you started:

for x, y > 0:

xy = yx
y ln x = x ln y
y / ln y = x / ln x
ln y / y = ln x / x

(note each step is reversible)

so consider f(t) = ln t / t
then f'(t) = (1 - ln t) / t2

So we see that f(t) is strictly increasing for t < e and strictly decreasing for t > e. This means that for any z, f(t)=z has at most two solutions. More specifically one can fairly easily show that:

the equation f(t) = z has:
exactly 1 solution if z <= 0
exactly 2 solutions if 0 < z < 1/e
exactly 1 solution if z = 1/e
exactly 0 solutions if z > 1/e


We've seen that if xy = yx iff f(x)=f(y).

y = x is clearly a solution... meaning that it is the only solution (for a given x) iff f(x) <= 0 or f(x) = 1/e... that is if x <= 1 or x = e.

Also, we can see that if there are two solutions of xy = yx for a given x, then either
1 < x < e < y
or
1 < y < e < x

For example, the only nontrivial solution I know off the top of my head is 24 = 42... clearly 1 < 2 < e < 4


But as I mentioned, I strongly suspect no elementary closed form solution is possible.
 
I believe it is

y(x) = (x productlog(-ln(x)/x))/ln(x);
where prductlog(x) gives the principal solution for w in x=w e^w.
Not all solutions are found.
 
well, i am not quite sure about it so don't take it for granted...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top