X_iu^i: Physical Significance & Conservation

AI Thread Summary
The scalar quantity X_i u^i, formed from a Killing vector and a tangent vector of a geodesic, is constant along the geodesic, indicating a conserved quantity in the system. This conservation arises from the properties of Killing vectors, which represent symmetries in spacetime. The derivation shows that the contraction of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors results in zero, confirming the constancy of the scalar along the geodesic. For a freely falling massive particle, this conservation translates to a geometric expression of the local conservation of its 4-momentum. Thus, the relationship highlights the significance of Killing fields in understanding the symmetries and conservation laws in general relativity.
c299792458
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Let us denote by X^i=(1,\vec 0) the Killing vector and by u^i(s) a tangent vector of a geodesic, where s is some affine parameter.

What physical significance do the scalar quantity X_iu^i and its conservation hold? If any...? I have seen this in may books and exam questions. I wonder what it means...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there! The point is that the scalar quantity you formed is constant along the geodesic! Using your notation, \triangledown _{U}(X_{i}U^{i}) = U^{j}\triangledown _{j}(X_{i}U^{i}) = U^{j}U^{i}\triangledown _{j}X_{i} + X_{i}U^{j}\triangledown _{j}U^{i}. Note that U^{j}U^{i}\triangledown _{j}X_{i} vanishes because U^{j}U^{i} is symmetric in the two indices whereas, by definition of a killing vector, \triangledown _{j}X_{i} is anti - symmetric in the two indices and it is very easy to show that the contraction of a symmetric tensor with an anti - symmetric one will vanish. The second term X_{i}U^{j}\triangledown _{j}U^{i} vanishes simply because U is the tangent vector to a geodesic thus we have that \triangledown _{U}(X_{i}U^{i}) = 0. In particular note that if this geodesic is the worldline of some freely falling massive particle then its 4 - velocity is the tangent vector to the worldline and we can re - express the condition for the worldline being a geodesic in terms of the 4 - momentum of the particle (and for photons just define the geodesic condition like this) and we can have that if X^{i} is a killing field on the space - time then X_{i}P^{i} will be constant along this geodesic. It is a geometric way of expressing local conservation of components of the 4 - momentum; these killing fields are differentiable symmetries of the space - time and you might be able to see that more clearly by the fact that the lie derivative of the metric tensor along the killing field will vanish.
 
dat signature...
 
jfy4 said:
dat signature...
:[ don't judge me T_T
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top