Challenge Yet another counterexample challenge

  • #101
Here's the proof that the set of continuity points is ##G_\delta## (meaning a countable intersection of open sets), which is of course equivalent that the set of continuity points is ##F_\sigma## by complementation.

So let ##f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## be any function. For ##n\in \mathbb{N}##, we let
A_n = \left\{x\in \mathbb{R}~\vert~\exists r_{n,x} >0:~\forall x', x''\in B(x, r_{n,x}):~|f(x'') - f(x')| < 1/n\right\}
where ##B(x,r) = \{a\in \mathbb{R}~\vert~|x-a|<r\}##.

1) First we show that each ##A_n## is open.
If ##x\in A_n##, then ##B(x, r_{n,x})\subseteq A_n##. And thus ##A_n = \bigcup_{x\in A_n} B(x,r_{n,x})## is the union of open sets and thus open.

2) We show that if ##f## is continuous at ##x##, then ##x\in A_n## for each ##n##
Indeed, if ##f## is continuous at ##x##, then there is some ##r_{n,x}>0## such that for all ##x' \in B(x,r_{n,x})## holds that ##|f(x) - f(x')| < \frac{1}{2n}##. And then the triangle inequality implies that for ##x',x''\in B(x,r_{n,x})## holds that
|f(x&#039;) - f(x&#039;&#039;)| \leq |f(x&#039;) - f(x)| + |f(x) + f(x&#039;&#039;)| &lt; \frac{1}{2n} + \frac{1}{2n} = \frac{1}{n}

And thus ##x\in A_n##.

3) We show that if ##x\in A_n## for each ##n##, then ##f## is continuous at ##x##.
Indeed, let ##\varepsilon>0## be arbitrary and take ##n## such that ##\frac{1}{n}<\varepsilon##. Since ##x\in A_n##, it follows that there is some ##r_{n,x}>0## such that for all ##x' \in B(x,r_{n,x})## holds that ##|f(x) - f(x')| <\frac{1}{n}<\varepsilon##. So ##f## is continuous at ##x##.

So it holds that the set of continuity points of ##f## is equal to ##\bigcap_{n\in \mathbb{N}} A_n##; which is the intersection of open sets, and thus a ##G_\delta##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Here is another example of a set of measure ##0## that is not ##F_\sigma## and thus not the discontinuity set of any function.

Let ##A_n## be a Cantor set in ##[0,1]## of measure ##\frac{n-1}{n}##. Let ##A = \bigcup_n A_n##, then since each ##A_n## is nowhere dense, we have that ##A## is of the first category. On the other hand ##\lambda(A) = \lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}\lambda(A_n) = 1##.

Then ##A' = [0,1]\setminus A## is of the second category and of measure ##0##. If it was the countable union of closed sets ##F_m##, then each ##F_m## would be closed and of measure ##0##, it would then be nowhere dense. This would mean that ##A'## is of the first category, which is not true.
 
  • #103
Thank you everybody for participating to this thread! If anybody is interested in more counterexamples, get the book by Gelbaum and Olmsted "Counterexamples in analysis"

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486428753/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 

Similar threads

Replies
62
Views
9K
2
Replies
80
Views
9K
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
42
Views
10K
2
Replies
61
Views
11K
2
Replies
93
Views
14K
2
Replies
61
Views
12K
2
Replies
86
Views
13K
Replies
39
Views
12K
Back
Top