Is Yet Another Introduction to Analysis Worth Reading?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the value of a specific book on analysis for someone preparing for university-level mathematics. Participants express varying opinions on its suitability based on their backgrounds in calculus and set theory. For those with limited experience, the book is seen as a gentle introduction, while others suggest that it may be too simplistic and condescending. There is a consensus that while it may not serve as a comprehensive standalone resource, it could be beneficial as a supplementary text alongside more advanced materials. Ultimately, the decision to purchase the book hinges on individual learning preferences and financial considerations.
devious_
Messages
312
Reaction score
3


Is this book worth it? It seems like an interesting read.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
what level are you at? if you've just done calculus with no set theory then that book looks like it would be a very gentle intro to analysis. if you have done some set theory I would get a more advanced book like the one by Pfaffenberger/Johnsonbaugh (it's cheaper too I think)
 
I've done a little set theory, but I'm not looking for an advanced text. I just want something I could read before I start university in a few months.

After going through random pages of it on Amazon, I think I'm going to go ahead and buy it.

Thanks for your reply though. :)
 
it looks like mr rogers on analysis. i would steer clear of it, unless you enjoy being talked down to.
 
I on the other hand think it would be excellent for the purpose devious wants. just to give him a leg up on understanding the course work to come. As a stand-alone teach yourself book, I agree it would be inadequate. Though depending on your financial resources and learning style it might be useful as a companion to a harder text.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top