Your Reasons Why Free Will is an Illusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avalon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Free will
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
16 replies · 3K views
Avalon
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Your Reasons Why "Free Will" is an Illusion

Cmon all you determinists. Provide me with your reasons and I will pick the best one. We are having a debate in my class and I need some thoughts.

POST AWAY!

I am looking for the best reason.Criteria for argument:

-Short

-Simple

-Strong

The Three S'(s).
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org


You will pick the best one? I.e. who is "most" right? Then what are the criteria for a good argument against free will?

By the way, is the fact that I'm posting in this thread while I think it's actually a waste of my time a good reason, or just empirical evidence (to which no induction can be applied).
 


OK, how about: Quantum mechanics tells us so?
You can pick any interpretation of QM (or make up your own).

Ow, you are looking for determinist reasonings. In that case I further refrain from the discussion.
(I've failed already anyway; which reminds me why I prefer science over philosophy :wink:)
 


I can usually argue both sides of anything but in this case my lack of free will is compelling me to tell you that can't be argued because it isn't an illusion. Sorry, wish I was free to give you a reason that free will is an illusion.

You are being forced to argue against free will even though you can't think of a reason to support that idea? Hmmm, sounds like you don't have free will.
 
Last edited:


Come on, it was just a movie. Besides, no fish could ever be that big.
 


jimmysnyder said:
Come on, it was just a movie. Besides, no fish could ever be that big.

This argument cinches it for me.
 


Avalon said:
CompuChip: Fail

NEXT.
Sounds more like Avalon: Fail.

(Do your own homework!)
 


For a nontechnical person, has determinism objection been proven?
 


Hume's argument is as follows: even if I grant that all of your sense impressions give you accurate information about the world, you still do not have any sense impressions of free will itself.
 


Avalon said:
Cmon all you determinists. Provide me with your reasons and I will pick the best one. We are having a debate in my class and I need some thoughts.

POST AWAY!

I am looking for the best reason.


Criteria for argument:

-Short

-Simple

-Strong

The Three S'(s).
FREE WILL refers to the fact that, in general, we can't specify the causes for the choices we make. Where you can specify the causes, then, by definition, your choice wasn't FREE.

So, FREE WILL means essentially the same thing as RANDOMNESS which means UNPREDICTABILITY. And neither FREE WILL nor RANDOMNESS tell us anything about whether or not Nature is DETERMINISTIC.

The fact that we are able to predict lots of natural phenomena suggests that nature is deterministic. The fact that quantum theory is able to predict the statistical results of a large number of experimental phenomena suggests that nature is deterministic. The fact that we still can't predict lots and lots of stuff suggests that our knowledge of Nature is incomplete.
 


Redbelly, isn't the alternative definition
Threads with more than 25 posts and no (sensible) mathematical symbols, formulas or anything resembling a scientifical statement
equally good and applicable to this thread?

(I have included the mathematical symbols / formulas part to exclude certain long mathematics threads)
 


CompuChip said:
Redbelly, isn't the alternative definition

Threads with more than 25 posts and no (sensible) mathematical symbols, formulas or anything resembling a scientifical statement

equally good and applicable to this thread?

(I have included the mathematical symbols / formulas part to exclude certain long mathematics threads)

Well heck, I completely forgot about that. And it's clearly stated in Section 8-12.1, paragraph 7 of our By-laws!
 


Redbelly98 said:
Well heck, I completely forgot about that. And it's clearly stated in Section 8-12.1, paragraph 7 of our By-laws!

Well well, I didn't even know that.
I tried to read them, but I didn't get past Section 6. My ISP informed me that I had reached my monthly download limit. But it's March 1 now, so I can read another 6 sections.