Your Reasons Why Free Will is an Illusion

  • Thread starter Avalon
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Free will
In summary, determinism is an illusion because we can't predict things that don't have a causal link, quantum mechanics and other physical laws are deterministic, and free will doesn't exist because it's an unprovable paradox.
  • #1
Avalon
19
0
Your Reasons Why "Free Will" is an Illusion

Cmon all you determinists. Provide me with your reasons and I will pick the best one. We are having a debate in my class and I need some thoughts.

POST AWAY!

I am looking for the best reason.Criteria for argument:

-Short

-Simple

-Strong

The Three S'(s).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


You will pick the best one? I.e. who is "most" right? Then what are the criteria for a good argument against free will?

By the way, is the fact that I'm posting in this thread while I think it's actually a waste of my time a good reason, or just empirical evidence (to which no induction can be applied).
 
  • #3


CompuChip: Fail

NEXT.
 
  • #4


OK, how about: Quantum mechanics tells us so?
You can pick any interpretation of QM (or make up your own).

Ow, you are looking for determinist reasonings. In that case I further refrain from the discussion.
(I've failed already anyway; which reminds me why I prefer science over philosophy :wink:)
 
  • #5


I can usually argue both sides of anything but in this case my lack of free will is compelling me to tell you that can't be argued because it isn't an illusion. Sorry, wish I was free to give you a reason that free will is an illusion.

You are being forced to argue against free will even though you can't think of a reason to support that idea? Hmmm, sounds like you don't have free will.
 
Last edited:
  • #6


Come on, it was just a movie. Besides, no fish could ever be that big.
 
  • #7


jimmysnyder said:
Come on, it was just a movie. Besides, no fish could ever be that big.

This argument cinches it for me.
 
  • #8


Avalon said:
CompuChip: Fail

NEXT.
Sounds more like Avalon: Fail.

(Do your own homework!)
 
  • #9


For a nontechnical person, has determinism objection been proven?
 
  • #10


Philosophical paradoxes are the illusion.
 
  • #11


Hume's argument is as follows: even if I grant that all of your sense impressions give you accurate information about the world, you still do not have any sense impressions of free will itself.
 
  • #12


This thread = YAWN.
 
  • #13


Avalon said:
Cmon all you determinists. Provide me with your reasons and I will pick the best one. We are having a debate in my class and I need some thoughts.

POST AWAY!

I am looking for the best reason.


Criteria for argument:

-Short

-Simple

-Strong

The Three S'(s).
FREE WILL refers to the fact that, in general, we can't specify the causes for the choices we make. Where you can specify the causes, then, by definition, your choice wasn't FREE.

So, FREE WILL means essentially the same thing as RANDOMNESS which means UNPREDICTABILITY. And neither FREE WILL nor RANDOMNESS tell us anything about whether or not Nature is DETERMINISTIC.

The fact that we are able to predict lots of natural phenomena suggests that nature is deterministic. The fact that quantum theory is able to predict the statistical results of a large number of experimental phenomena suggests that nature is deterministic. The fact that we still can't predict lots and lots of stuff suggests that our knowledge of Nature is incomplete.
 
  • #14


When I saw this thread title, I wondered why it wasn't posted in Philosophy ...

Avalon said:
Criteria for argument:

-Short

-Simple

... until I got to that part :smile:
 
  • #15


Redbelly, isn't the alternative definition
Threads with more than 25 posts and no (sensible) mathematical symbols, formulas or anything resembling a scientifical statement
equally good and applicable to this thread?

(I have included the mathematical symbols / formulas part to exclude certain long mathematics threads)
 
  • #16


CompuChip said:
Redbelly, isn't the alternative definition

Threads with more than 25 posts and no (sensible) mathematical symbols, formulas or anything resembling a scientifical statement

equally good and applicable to this thread?

(I have included the mathematical symbols / formulas part to exclude certain long mathematics threads)

Well heck, I completely forgot about that. And it's clearly stated in Section 8-12.1, paragraph 7 of our By-laws!
 
  • #17


Redbelly98 said:
Well heck, I completely forgot about that. And it's clearly stated in Section 8-12.1, paragraph 7 of our By-laws!

Well well, I didn't even know that.
I tried to read them, but I didn't get past Section 6. My ISP informed me that I had reached my monthly download limit. But it's March 1 now, so I can read another 6 sections.
 

1. What is free will?

Free will is the belief that individuals have the ability to make choices and decisions that are not determined by external factors. It is the idea that we have control over our thoughts, actions, and behaviors.

2. Why do some scientists argue that free will is an illusion?

Some scientists argue that free will is an illusion because they believe that all of our thoughts and actions are ultimately determined by biological, environmental, and social factors. They argue that our brains and genetics are responsible for our decisions, rather than a sense of free will.

3. What evidence supports the idea that free will is an illusion?

Studies in neuroscience and psychology have shown that our brains make decisions before we are consciously aware of them, suggesting that our actions are determined by our brain activity rather than our conscious choices. Additionally, research has shown that our environment and upbringing can heavily influence our behaviors and decisions.

4. How does the idea of an illusion of free will impact society?

If free will is indeed an illusion, it could have implications for our legal and justice systems, as well as our moral and ethical beliefs. It may also challenge our sense of personal responsibility and accountability for our actions.

5. Is there any way to prove or disprove the existence of free will?

Currently, there is no conclusive scientific evidence that definitively proves or disproves the existence of free will. It ultimately remains a philosophical and theoretical debate with no clear answer. Some argue that the illusion of free will is necessary for our sense of self and agency, while others believe that understanding the true nature of our decision-making processes is crucial for our understanding of consciousness and human behavior.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
665
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
904
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
199
Views
31K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
654
Replies
1
Views
717
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top