Z-bosons as Hawking radiation from BH

tzimie
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
Please check my logic.

1. Hawking mechanism should give birth not only to photons, but also to their heavier analogs, Z for example.
2. Contrary to photons, massive Z bosons are not gradually red shifted, low energy Z simply fall back to BH, so the "red" part of the black-body spectrum of Z is cut. It is also distorted because Z has non-zero invariant mass.
3. Finally Z decay to photons, but the spectrum of these photons carry the "birth defect" - missing "red" part of the spectrum.
4. As a result, total Hawking radiation from BH has NOT a black-body spectrum because of massive particles.

I understand that effect is tiny, but is my logic flawed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tzimie said:
2. Contrary to photons, massive Z bosons are not gradually red shifted, low energy Z simply fall back to BH, so the "red" part of the black-body spectrum of Z is cut. It is also distorted because Z has non-zero invariant mass.
Distorted as in "non-existent" - unless the black hole is so small that its temperature gets comparable to 90 GeV. Such a small black hole will emit all particles lighter than the Z as well.
tzimie said:
3. Finally Z decay to photons
That decay is very unlikely, it hasn't been observed so far. It would need at least three photons and a loop. A very old paper (before the top discovery) predicts a partial decay width of only 1.35 eV, or roughly 1 decay in a billion.
tzimie said:
4. As a result, total Hawking radiation from BH has NOT a black-body spectrum because of massive particles.
It has a black-body spectrum by definition of that spectrum. At very high temperatures massive particles become part of that spectrum, if you have a possible decay you also have the possible recombination.
 
mfb said:
1 Distorted as in "non-existent" - unless the black hole is so small that its temperature gets comparable to 90 GeV.
2 It has a black-body spectrum by definition of that spectrum. At very high temperatures massive particles become part of that spectrum, if you have a possible decay you also have the possible recombination.

1 I understand, this is like Scharnhorst effect, the value of effect is irrelevant.
2 Hm...may be this is the answer...
So Planck's law of black-body radiation is valid only on the low-energy limit?
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top