Boolean Algebra in the Context of Mathematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a course in Boolean algebra, officially titled "Mathematical Logic," which diverges from typical American courses in mathematical logic. Key topics covered include Boolean functions, identities, normal forms, and Shannon's expansion, with a noted lack of equivalent courses or resources in the U.S. The participant expresses confusion over the terminology and depth of content, questioning whether Boolean algebra is primarily taught in applied contexts like computer science rather than as a standalone mathematical course. They also mention limited online resources and a lack of textbooks in libraries, indicating a gap in available educational materials. The conversation highlights a curiosity about the differences in teaching approaches between regions.
PhotonTrail
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm currently taking a course on Boolean algebra. It's officially named "Mathematical Logic", but I really don't see much resemblance between what I'm doing and other courses of mathematical logic that are taught in the US.

It has only been a couple of weeks, but to let you have an inkling of the syllabus, so far we've covered roughly the following content:
  • Boolean functions and formulae
  • Identities of Boolean algebra
  • Representation by schemes of functional elements
  • Disjunctive and conjunctive normal forms
  • Shannon's expansion - simply referred to as the decomposition theorem in my course
  • Algebraic normal form
  • Essential and fictitious variables
What I find rather curious is that I simply cannot find an equivalent course at an American institution. It is also quite impossible to find supplementary information on the internet. For example, when I was confused about Shannon's expansion, all I could find online was stuff about decomposition by one variable, whereas my course covered the more general situation of decomposition by m variables.

So, what's the deal? Is it simply taught under a different guise with completely different terminology in the States? A quick search on the forums brought up an ancient thread that mentioned a textbook by a certain Dr Monk published in the late 1980s, but it seems to be out of print. It probably approaches the subject with way more depth and breadth than I require, too.

Is the topic even being taught today, as a mathematical course? Or are people only concerned about the applied aspects of it in computer science?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I took a ring theory class and the textbook was on intro abstract algebra. There was a chapter (maybe even two) that talked about it but we never did it. And yea funny because I was looking around too for a course about it too but couldn't find one. I haven't looked for textbooks in our library though.

Weird title by the way o_0
 
Square1 said:
I took a ring theory class and the textbook was on intro abstract algebra. There was a chapter (maybe even two) that talked about it but we never did it. And yea funny because I was looking around too for a course about it too but couldn't find one. I haven't looked for textbooks in our library though.

Weird title by the way o_0

Haha my thread title? I was trying to get across the idea that I'm curious about what's happening on the mathematical side of the pond. I'm quite sure computer scientists do deal with it on a regular basis in some form or another. The most helpful resources I've found on the internet so far came from computer science departments, and largely dealt with logic gates if I remember correctly.
 
I see I see. Yeah try looking in abstraact algebra books I guess.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top