| New Reply |
Poisson brackets of angular momentum components |
Share Thread |
| Dec27-12, 05:27 AM | #1 |
|
|
Poisson brackets of angular momentum components
I want to find [M_i, M_j] Poisson brackets.
$$[M_i, M_j]=\sum_l (\frac{\partial M_i}{\partial q_l}\frac{\partial M_j}{\partial p_l}-\frac{\partial M_i}{\partial p_l}\frac{\partial M_j}{\partial q_l})$$ I know that: $$M_i=\epsilon _{ijk} q_j p_k$$ $$M_j=\epsilon _{jnm} q_n p_m$$ and so: $$[M_i, M_j]=\sum_l (\frac{\partial \epsilon _{ijk} q_j p_k}{\partial q_l}\frac{\partial \epsilon _{jnm} q_n p_m}{\partial p_l}-\frac{\partial \epsilon _{ijk} q_j p_k}{\partial p_l}\frac{\partial \epsilon _{jnm} q_n p_m}{\partial q_l})$$ $$= \sum_l \epsilon _{ijk} p_k \delta_{jl} \cdot \epsilon_{jnm} q_n \delta_{ml}- \sum_l \epsilon_{ijk}q_j \delta_{kl} \cdot \epsilon_{jnm} p_m \delta_{nl}$$ Then I have thought that values that nullify deltas don't add any informations in the summations. And so, $$m=l, j=l$$ but so I obtain $$m=j$$. But if $$m=l$$, the second Levi-Civita symbol in the first summation is zero... And if I go on, I obtain $$[M_i, M_j]=-p_iq_j$$ instead of $$[M_i, M_j]=q_ip_j-p_iq_j$$ Where am I wrong? :| Could you say to me how to go on? Thanks a lot! |
| Dec27-12, 07:15 AM | #2 |
|
|
You have 3 j's in the same term. Make sure your dummy indices (i.e. the ones that are summed over) are different from the variable indices. Use a different letter for each dummy index to avoid confusion.
|
| Dec30-12, 02:44 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| poisson |
Similar discussions for: Poisson brackets of angular momentum components
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Poisson brackets and angular momentum | Advanced Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| Poisson's Brackets | Classical Physics | 0 | ||
| Are Lx, Ly, Lz (the components of Angular Momentum)independent to each other? | Classical Physics | 2 | ||
| Components for the angular momentum operator L | Advanced Physics Homework | 4 | ||
| Poisson Brackets | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||