Does weight affect an object's speed during free fall?

AI Thread Summary
All objects fall at the same speed in a vacuum, regardless of their weight, as demonstrated by the example of a feather and a bowling ball dropped on the moon. The confusion arises from the definition of weight, which is the force due to gravity and is dependent on mass. While the bowling ball has greater mass and therefore greater weight, both objects experience the same acceleration due to gravity. This is explained by Newton's second law, where the acceleration remains constant despite differences in weight. In the absence of air resistance, all objects fall at the same rate.
musicboy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi there
Just wondering: all objects fall at the same speed, right(not taking into account air resistance)? So if I dropped a feather and a bowling ball on the moon, they'd fall at the same speed. So far so good.
But my physics book's definition of weight is "The weight of an object is the force that acts on it because of gravity; Weight = Mass x Acceleration due to gravity" .
The bowling ball's mass is clearly greater than the feather's, so therefore it's weight and therefore pull of gravity on it must be different, resulting in a different speed...
Confused!
Any help much appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi musicboy! :smile:
musicboy said:
… my physics book's definition of weight is "The weight of an object is the force that acts on it because of gravity; Weight = Mass x Acceleration due to gravity" .
The bowling ball's mass is clearly greater than the feather's, so therefore it's weight and therefore pull of gravity on it must be different, resulting in a different speed...

yes, the force of gravity on it is greater (Mg > mg)

but force = mass times acceleration (that's Newton's second law),

so the accelerations are the same (A = Mg/M, a = mg/m) :wink:
 
musicboy said:
Weight = Mass x Acceleration...

The bowling ball's mass is clearly greater than the feather's, so therefore it's weight and therefore pull of gravity on it must be different,
You have the equation right there. If you change Weight & Mass by the same factor, Acceleration stays the same.

musicboy said:
resulting in a different speed...
The terminal speed, where air resistance = weight, is different. But in vacuum they fall the same.
 
To add to what A.T. And Tiny-Tim have said... There's an FAQ on this at https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=209
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gotcha :)
Thanks very much all of you for quick and concise replies.
Have a good day :D
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why do objects fall at the same speed in free fall?
Replies
30
Views
5K
I Apparent Weight problem (falling beam)
Replies
2
Views
2K
B How Does Liquid Density and Viscosity Influence Free Fall Braking?
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Why Is an Object's Weight Equal to the Force of Gravity It Experiences?
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Free fall does'nt consider weight
Replies
2
Views
2K
Falling Feather and ball in vacuum
Replies
13
Views
2K
Does inertia have anything to do with bodies falling at the same rate?
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fall Rate of Objects: Explaining Why Weight Matters
Replies
3
Views
2K
Effect of the Location of the Center of Mass on the Falling Time....
Replies
8
Views
12K
Falling objects: Tennis ball vs. feather
Replies
25
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top