Deriving the Yang-Mills-Higgs Equations of Motion: A Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Charles_Henry
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Yang-mills
In summary, we derived the Yang-Mills-Higgs equations of motion from the given Lagrangian and showed that in SU(2) Yang-Mills-Higgs theory, the general solution to a specific equation is given by a combination of the gauge field and the covariant higgs field. We also discussed the role of gauge transformations and explained the use of Euler-Lagrange equations in the derivation.
  • #1
Charles_Henry
14
0

Homework Statement



1. Derive the Yang-Mills-Higgs equations of motion

[itex] (D_{v}F^{\mu, v})^{a} = - \epsilon^{abc}\phi^{b}(D^{\mu}\phi)^{c}[/itex] and [itex] (D_{\mu}D^{\mu}\phi)^{a} = - c(|\phi|^{2} - v^{2}) \phi^{a} [/itex]

from [itex] \mathcal{L} = - \frac{1}{4} F^{a}_{\mu v}F^{\mu v a} + \frac{1}{2}D_{\mu}\phi^{a}D^{\mu}\phi^{a} - U(\phi) [/itex]

where is c is a constant.

2. Show that in SU(2) Yang-Mills-Higgs theory the general solution to the equation [itex] D_{i}\hat{\phi}=0 [/itex] with [itex] |\hat{\phi}| = 1 [/itex] is

[itex] A^{a}_{i} = -\epsilon^{abc}\partial_{i}\hat{\phi}^{b}\hat{\phi}^{c} + k_{i}\hat{\phi}^{a} [/itex]


The attempt at a solution

1st question:

Assume finiteness of the energy by

[itex] \phi \rightarrow v [/itex] [itex] D_{mu} \phi \rightarrow 0 [/itex] [itex] F_{{\mu}v} \rightarrow 0 [/itex] as [itex] r \rightarrow \infty [/itex]

Let

[itex] F = \frac{1}{2} F_{{\mu},v}dx^{\mu} \wedge dx{v} = dA + A \wedge A [/itex] be

the gauge field of A.

with components

[itex] F_{{\mu}v} = \partial_{\mu}A_{v} - \partial_{v}A_{\mu} + [ A_{\mu}, A_{v}] = [D_{\mu}, D_{v}] [/itex]

We define gauge identities [itex] (A, A') [/itex] and [itex] (F, F') [/itex] where

[itex] A' = gAg^{-1} - dgg^{-1} [/itex] [itex] F' = gFg^{-1} [/itex] and [itex] g = g(x^{\mu}) \in G [/itex]

which satisfies the bianchi identity

[itex] DF = dF + [A,F] = d^2 A + dA \wedge A - A \wedge dA + A \wedge dA + A^3 - dA \wedge A - A^3 = 0 [/itex]

The field

[itex] \phi: \mathbb{R}^{D+1} \rightarrow \mathfrak{g} [/itex]

[itex] D\phi = d\phi + [A, \phi] [/itex] with gauge transformation,

[itex] \phi' = g \phi g^{-1} [/itex]

if [itex] G = SU(2) [/itex] choose a basis [itex] T_{a} , a =1,2,3 [/itex]

for the algebra of anti hermitian (2x2 matrices), such that

[itex] [T_{a},T_{b}] = - \epsilon_{abc}T_{c}

T_{a} = \frac{1}{2} i\sigma_{a} [/itex] where [itex] \sigma_{a} [/itex] are pauli matrices.

[itex] Tr (T_{a}T_{b}) = - \frac{1}{2} \delta_{ab} [/itex]

a general group element is [itex] g = exp (\alpha^{a}T_{a}) [/itex] with [itex] \alpha^{a} [/itex] being real. The components of [itex] D/phi [/itex] and [itex] F [/itex] with respect to the basis are given by

[itex] (D_{\mu} \phi)^{a} = \partial_{\mu} \phi^{a} - \epsilon^{abc} A^{b}_{\mu} \phi^{c} [/itex] and [itex] F^{a}_{{\mu}v} = \partial_{\mu}A^{a}_{v} - \partial_{v}A^{a}_{\mu} - \epsilon^{abc}A^{b}_{\mu}A^{c}_{v} [/itex]

when [itex] D+1 = 4 [/itex] the dual of the field tensor is

[itex] (\ast F)_{{\mu}v} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{{\mu}v{\alpha}{\beta}}F^{{\alpha}{\beta}} [/itex]

we introduce a two form [itex] F = (\frac{1}{2}) F_{{\mu}v}dx^{\mu} \wedge dx^{v} [/itex] (Self-Dual)

or [itex] \ast F = F [/itex] [itex] \ast F = - F [/itex] (Anti-Self-Dual)

[itex] - Tr (F \wedge \ast F) = - \frac{1}{2} Tr (F_{{\mu}v} F^{{\mu}v})d^{4}x \frac{1}{4} F^{a}_{{\mu}v}F^{{\mu}va}d^{4}x [/itex]

where [itex] d^{4}x = \frac{1}{24}\epsilon_{{\mu} v {\alpha} {\beta} } dx^{\mu} \wedge dx^{v} \wedge dx^{\alpha} \wedge dx^{\beta} [/itex]

to be continued...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For part 1, you will want to use the Euler-Lagrange equations. Gauge transformations and differential forms don't directly figure into deriving equations of motion from a Lagrangian.
 
  • #3
thank you :)

Ok, so a YM over 'space-time' [itex] \mathbb{R}^{3}[/itex] x [itex] \mathbb{R} [/itex] with a euclidean metric,

[itex] Y = \mathbb{R}^{3} [/itex] with t a local co-ordinate on [itex] \mathbb{R} [/itex]

[itex] A_{y} dt + A [/itex] when [itex] A_{y} = 0 [/itex]

therefore,

[itex] F_{ni} = \frac{{\partial} A_{i}}{{\partial}_{t}} [/itex]

such that

[itex] \frac{{\partial}A_{i}}{dt} = \frac{{\delta}W[A]}{{\delta}A_{i}} [/itex]

where [itex] W[A] = \int_{y} Tr (A \wedge dA + \frac{2}{3} A \wedge A \wedge A) [/itex] is

[itex] \int_{\mathbb{R}} (\frac{1}{2} ||\hat{A}||^{2} - V [A]) dt [/itex]

where [itex] v[A] [/itex] is the magnetic part of the YM curvature, that is

[itex] ||A||^2 = \int_{\mathbb{R}} Tr (\frac{dA_{i}}{dt} \frac{dA_{i}}{dt}) d^{n}x [/itex]

[itex] v[A] = \frac{1}{4} \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} Tr (F_{ij}F_{ij})d^nx [/itex]

[itex] \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} Tr \frac{{\delta}W}{{\delta}A_{i}} \frac{{\delta}W}{{\delta}A_{i}})d^{n}x [/itex]

[itex] = \frac{1}{2} |\frac{{\delta}W}{{\delta}A}|^{n} [/itex]

if n above is 2

[itex] \frac{1}{2} |\Delta W |^{2} + V(q) = 0 [/itex]

adding a constant E.

[itex] \frac{1}{2} |\Delta W|^{2} + V(q) = E [/itex]

we can approximate the system by classical motion along gradient lines with reversed potential.

[itex] \frac{1}{2} |\Delta W|^{2} = V(q) - E [/itex]

Moreover, when [itex] \mathbb{R}^{3} [/itex]

[itex] \int_{\mathbb{R}^{3}} \frac{1}{4} F^{a}_{ij} F^{a}_{ij} + \frac{1}{2} (D_{k} \phi)^{a} (D_{k} \phi)^{a} ] d^{3}x [/itex]

[itex] \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} (B_{k} - D_{k} \phi)^{a} [/itex]

[itex] (B_{k}-D_{k}\phi)^{a} d^{3}x [/itex] + [itex] \int_{\mathbb{R}^{3}} {B^{a}_{k}} (D_{k} \phi)^{a} d^{3}x [/itex]

[itex] = E_{1} + E_{2}
[/itex]

is this the right path?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Not really. You gave the Lagrangian [itex] \mathcal{L}[/itex] in the statement of part 1, so you just have to use the Euler-Lagrange equations. Schematically, these are

[tex] \left(\partial_\mu \frac{\delta }{\delta (\partial_\mu \psi)} - \frac{\delta}{\delta \psi}\right) \mathcal{L}(\psi,\partial_\mu\psi) = 0 .[/tex]

You just have to adapt this to the case where the fields are [itex] \psi = ( A^a_\mu , \phi^a)[/itex]. If you are having trouble, make sure that you know how this works for the simpler cases of the free scalar field and U(1) gauge field without matter.
 
  • #5
Ok,

A lagrangian density [itex] \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\phi^{a}, \partial_{\mu}\phi^{a}) [/itex] where [itex] \partial_{\mu} = \frac{\partial}{\partial_{\mu}} [/itex] depending on the fields and first derivatives?[itex][/itex]

[itex] S = \int_{\mathbb{R}^{D}} \mathcal{L} d^{D} xdt [/itex]

and from the least action principle

[itex] \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi^{a}} - \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{(\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi^{a}}) = 0 [/itex]

[itex] \partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} \phi^{A} = - \frac{\partial U}{\partial \phi^{a}} [/itex]

find [itex] \phi_{s} = \phi_{s}(x,y) [/itex] ?

from hereon, the literature derives the lorentz-invariance, and then proceeds to calculate the corresponding infinitesimal change in lagrangian density. Euler-Lagrange equations are then used to cancel out remaining terms, and the equation now fits the conserved current in accordance to Noether (Q).
 
  • #6
trying different things

[itex] U(\phi) [/itex] is gauge invariant

[itex] \partial^{\mu} F^{a}_{{\mu} v} + g \epsilon^{abc}D^{{\mu} b} F^{c}_{{\mu} v} = 0 [/itex]

[itex] F_{\mu v} = T^{a} F^{a}_{\mu v} [/itex]

[itex] (D^{\mu} F_{v \mu})^{a} + (D_{k} F_{\mu v})^{a} + (D_{v} F_{k \mu})^{a} = 0 [/itex]

[itex] \partial^{\mu} F^{a}_{\mu v} + g \epsilon^{abc} A^{\mu b} F^{c}_{\mu v} = -J^{a}_{v} [/itex]

[itex] c = (A, \phi) [/itex] [itex] D_{A} \ast F_{A} + [ \phi, D_{A} \phi ] = 0 [/itex]

[itex] D_{A} \ast D_{A} \phi = 0[/itex]

With boundary conditions we have

[itex]lim _{|x| \rightarrow \infty} | \phi| = 1[/itex]

[itex] A( A, \phi) = (\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |F_{A}|^2 (x) + |D_{A} \phi|^2 (x) ) d^{3} x [/itex]

Alternatively,

the potential [itex] A_{\mu} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_a A^{a}_{\mu} [/itex]

[itex] F_{{\mu} v} = \partial_{\mu} A_{v} - \partial_{v} A_{\mu} + i [A_{\mu}, A_{v}] [/itex]

the covariant higgs field [itex] \phi = \tau_{a} \phi^{a} [/itex]

[itex] D_{\mu} \phi = \partial_{\mu} \phi + i [A_{\mu}, \phi] [/itex]

[itex] A_{\mu} \rightarrow gA_{\mu}g^{-1} + i \partial_{\mu}gg^{-1} [/itex]

[itex] \phi \rightarrow g \phi g^-{1} [/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Charles_Henry said:
Ok,

A lagrangian density [itex] \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\phi^{a}, \partial_{\mu}\phi^{a}) [/itex] where [itex] \partial_{\mu} = \frac{\partial}{\partial_{\mu}} [/itex] depending on the fields and first derivatives?[itex][/itex]

[itex] S = \int_{\mathbb{R}^{D}} \mathcal{L} d^{D} xdt [/itex]

and from the least action principle

[itex] \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi^{a}} - \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{(\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi^{a}}) = 0 [/itex]

[itex] \partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} \phi^{A} = - \frac{\partial U}{\partial \phi^{a}} [/itex]

Yes, that's how it works for the scalar without the gauge field. The least action principle leads to the Euler-Lagrange equations which are the equations of motion you're looking for. Just go back and apply them to the Lagrangian with the gauge field. The rest of the equations you keep quoting are irrelevant for the problem.
 
  • #8
oh, I see...

The least-action principle does not hold on this occasion, because we're gauging (localizing).

[itex] \psi \rightarrow e^{i e \theta \psi} [/itex]

and

[itex] \theta \neq [/itex] constant, therefore [itex] \theta = \theta (x^{\mu}) [/itex]

[itex] \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}} [/itex] changes to [itex] D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} - ieA_{\mu} [/itex] [itex] A_{\mu} [/itex] transitions to [itex] A_{\mu} \rightarrow A_{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} \theta [/itex]

so [itex] \mathcal{L} = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{1}{2} D_{\mu}D^{\mu} \phi^{2} [/itex]

[itex] \mathcal{L} = (\phi^{a}, D_{\mu} \phi^{a}) [/itex]

[itex] D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} - ieA_{\mu} [/itex]

[itex] \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} D_{\mu} \phi^{a} D^{\mu} \phi^{a} - \frac{1}{4}c(|\phi|^2 - v^2)^{2} [/itex]

[itex] D^{\mu} D_{\mu} \phi^{a} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi ^{a}} [/itex]

[itex] \mathcal{L} \rightarrow \mathcal{L} + \epsilon D_{\mu}B^{\mu} [/itex]

[itex] \mathcal{L} \rightarrow \mathcal{L} + \epsilon \partial_{\mu} - ie A_{\mu} B^{\mu} [/itex]

[itex] \phi^{a} (x) \rightarrow \phi^{a} (x) + \epsilon W^{a} (x) [/itex]

closer?
 
  • #9
ok in full force now,

the matter lagrangian is complemented by adding a gauge term [itex] F_{\mu v} F^{\mu v} [/itex]

[itex] F_{\mu v} = \partial_{\mu}A_{v} - \partial_{v}A_{\mu} [/itex] (gauge field)

now,

[itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}} [/itex] transforms to [itex] D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} - ie A_{\mu} [/itex]

[itex] A_{\mu} \rightarrow A_{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} \theta [/itex]

[itex](D_{\mu} \phi)^a = \partial_{\mu} \phi^a - \epsilon^{abc} A_{\mu}^{b} A_{v}^{c} [/itex]

and finally,

[itex] \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} = - \frac{1}{4}(\partial_{\mu} A^{a}_{v} - \partial_{v}A^{a}_{\mu} - \epsilon^{abc} A^{b}_{\mu} A^{c}_{v}) F^{\mu v a } + \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu} - ieA_{\mu}) \phi^a D^{\mu} \phi^{a} - U({\phi}) = 0 [/itex]

then simplify from hereon and solve...
 
Last edited:

1. What are Yang-Mills Equations?

Yang-Mills Equations are a set of partial differential equations that describe the behavior of gauge fields, which are fundamental to the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). They were first proposed by physicists Chen-Ning Yang and Robert Mills in the 1950s.

2. What is the significance of Yang-Mills Equations in physics?

Yang-Mills Equations are important in understanding the behavior of subatomic particles and the fundamental forces that govern their interactions. They are a key component of the Standard Model of particle physics and have been extensively used in the study of quantum field theory and elementary particles.

3. How do Yang-Mills Equations relate to other equations in physics?

Yang-Mills Equations are closely related to Maxwell's equations, which describe the behavior of electromagnetic fields. They are also connected to Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes the behavior of gravity. In fact, Yang-Mills Equations can be seen as a generalization of Maxwell's equations to include other fundamental forces.

4. What are some applications of Yang-Mills Equations?

Yang-Mills Equations have been used in numerous applications, including particle physics, cosmology, and quantum field theory. They have also been applied to the study of fluid dynamics and superconductivity.

5. Are there any current challenges or unresolved problems with Yang-Mills Equations?

One of the main challenges in studying Yang-Mills Equations is the phenomenon of confinement, which refers to the fact that quarks and gluons are never observed as isolated particles. This is still not fully understood and remains an active area of research in theoretical physics. Additionally, solving Yang-Mills Equations for large numbers of particles is computationally intensive and requires advanced mathematical techniques.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
648
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
678
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
294
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
836
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
861
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top