Undergraduate physics programs

In summary, the conversation discusses the speaker's search for guidance in ranking college physics programs. It is mentioned that graduate programs hold more weight in determining a school's reputation in physics, rather than undergraduate programs. The speaker also mentions that larger state universities may offer better research opportunities compared to smaller liberal arts schools. When asked about the best choice between Cal Tech, MIT, and Harvey Mudd, it is stated that it ultimately depends on the individual and how well they fit in with each school. The speaker also provides a detailed response from a parent of a recent Harvey Mudd graduate, emphasizing the importance of considering personal factors in choosing a college.
  • #1
strings235
26
0
hey everyone,

I'm currently applying for college right now and I need some guidance as to which schools are stronger than others in terms of education, research opportunities, etc.

Can someone give me some kinda ranking for college physics programs?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I believe most schools get their reputation for their graduate programs in physics, not undergraduate.

I believe that big state universities have better research opportunities than small liberal art schools. But, in smaller schools like liberal arts schools, there is a greater student-to-professor interaction.
 
  • #3
ok well here's the deal. I'm stuck between cal tech, mit, or harvey mudd. Forgetting graduate ranks and prestige cause it's nearly irrelevant at the college level, which would be a better choice?

Thanks
 
  • #4
They are all very good for undergraduate education. Depending on whom you talk to, people will say any of the three is the best choice.

Me, personally, I think the best choice depends more on you as a person and how well you fit in with each of the schools. On another forum, www.collegeconfidential.com, a poster named Mudder's_Mudder gave an eloquent response to this very question. Her son is a recent HMC graduate (class of '07). I am going to post her response in its entirety:

"Qwertz82, the answer to that will depend entirely on the individual student. The question is a little like asking why someone chose a kumquat instead of an apple or an orange. The nature and structure of the institutions are not the same, nor are the missions. Caltech and MIT are research unis. HMC is a LAC. Therein lies the essential difference.

My S is a rising senior at HMC. He knows a number of Mudders who faced the choices you outlined in your question. The three schools have surface differences that matter to some people: climate, social scene, geographic location (East vs. West, urban vs. suburban), gender balance, ECs like performing arts or music or sports. He knows kids who made the choice based on one or more of all those factors. Some kids got exceptional merit aid. I can think of one young man, accepted at all three, who picked Mudd because he thought it would be the easiest (to the everlasting detriment of his GPA, alas). Some chose HMC for the LAC environment, knowing they would apply to Caltech and/or MIT again for grad school. I can think of a couple who just didn't like something about the feel of the other two schools.

Some people know, the minute they step on a campus the first time, they've found a good fit; it's a feeling that's difficult to quantify. Kind of like Justice Stewart's famous dictum about pornography: you know it when you see it.

Now these superficial and sometimes indefinable qualities are all fine and good and worthy of consideration, but we are talking about education here, aren't we? Your post begs the question: Is there a discernible difference in the quality of education at the three institutions? My informed answer is... that depends. For certain programs and certain majors, I could build a case that anyone of the three is the best (e.g., all else being equal, econ/management majors and future linguists should go to MIT) or, conversely, all three are comparatively equal. My S is a science major, and I can state without hesitation that he has received at HMC as fine an undergraduate education in his discipline as he would have gotten anywhere, in line with his goals. (He is planning to apply to one of the other two for grad school.)

If you're a prospective college student trying to figure out where to apply, try to start by doing an honest self-assessment. Are you the big-city type who wants to get lost in a crowd? If so, then Caltech and HMC are probably not for you. Is widespread name recognition of utmost importance to you? If so, then HMC is probably not for you. Are you intimidated at the prospect of long, gray winters in the Northeast? Then MIT is probably not for you. Recognize also that every school has its pros and cons, its own quirks and personality that will never be posted in public on these boards (although you will undoubtedly find plenty of shills who will praise their own institutions to the high heavens for their own reasons). Check out lots of places. Visit as many as you can, and try falling in love with at least a few. Then you can start sweating the big stuff, like whether or not your parents can afford to pay for the courtship."
 

1. What is the difference between a Bachelor of Science and a Bachelor of Arts in Physics?

A Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Physics typically requires more courses in mathematics and science, while a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in Physics allows for more electives in other subjects. The B.S. option is generally more rigorous and prepares students for graduate studies, while the B.A. option may be better suited for those interested in a broader education or a career in a related field.

2. How long does it take to complete an undergraduate physics program?

Most undergraduate physics programs are designed to be completed in four years, assuming the student takes a full course load each semester. However, some students may take longer if they choose to pursue a double major or take on additional research opportunities.

3. Can I still pursue a career in physics if I do not major in it as an undergraduate?

Yes, many students who do not major in physics as undergraduates still go on to pursue careers in the field. Some may choose to pursue a graduate degree in physics, while others may enter the field through related disciplines such as engineering or computer science.

4. What types of courses can I expect to take in an undergraduate physics program?

An undergraduate physics program typically includes courses in classical mechanics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and statistical mechanics. Students may also have the opportunity to take specialized courses in areas such as astrophysics, biophysics, or condensed matter physics.

5. Do undergraduate physics programs offer opportunities for research?

Yes, many undergraduate physics programs offer research opportunities for students. This can include working with faculty on ongoing projects, participating in summer research programs, or conducting independent research projects. These experiences can be valuable for students considering graduate studies in physics or those interested in pursuing a career in research.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
785
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
856
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
215
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
669
Back
Top